24.11.2017 Views

Abelian Groups - László Fuchs [Springer]

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 Group Extensions 257<br />

μ<br />

−−−−→ A −−−−→ B<br />

⏐<br />

∥<br />

β↓<br />

−−−−→ A<br />

ν<br />

−−−−→ C −−−−→ 0<br />

∥<br />

μ ′<br />

−−−−→ B ′ ν ′<br />

−−−−→ C −−−−→ 0<br />

is commutative. In this case, the extensions e and e 0 themselves are called equivalent.<br />

Thus, there is a bijective correspondence between the equivalence classes of<br />

extensions of A by C and the equivalence classes of factor sets f W C C ! A.<br />

In this correspondence, the splitting extensions form an equivalence class, and the<br />

corresponding equivalence class of factor sets consists of factor sets of the form<br />

h.u/ C h.v/ h.u C v/ for arbitrary functions hW C ! A (with h.0/ D 0 as agreed).<br />

The Group Ext We have come to a leading idea: instead of being satisfied with<br />

a survey of the collection of all extensions, one tries to furnish this set with a proper<br />

algebraic structure which would provide a more powerful tool in the exploration.<br />

This was done by R. Baer who introduced a group structure, creating a fascinating<br />

theory.<br />

If f ; f 0 W C C ! A are factor sets, then their sum f C f 0 defined as<br />

.f C f 0 /.u;v/D f .u;v/C f 0 .u;v/<br />

is again a factor set. Under this composition, the factor sets form a group, denoted<br />

Z.C; A/. The coboundaries form a subgroup B.C; A/, and what has been concluded<br />

above can be rephrased by saying that there is a bijective correspondence between<br />

the equivalence classes of extensions of A by C and the elements of the factor group<br />

Z.C; A/=B.C; A/. This factor group is generally called the group of extensions of<br />

A by C:<br />

Ext.C; A/ D Z.C; A/=B.C; A/:<br />

Having defined Ext in terms of factor sets, we now proceed to another interpretation:<br />

via short exact sequences (9.1). If we think of extensions of A by C as such<br />

sequences, then it seems reasonable to create and to study first a category whose<br />

objects are short exact sequences. In doing so, the first order of business is to define<br />

the morphisms between two exact sequences, e and e 0 . The right definition is pretty<br />

clear: it is a triple .˛;ˇ;/of group homomorphisms rendering the diagram<br />

−−−−→ A −−−−→ B<br />

⏐ ⏐<br />

α↓<br />

β↓<br />

μ<br />

ν<br />

−−−−→ C −−−−→ 0<br />

⏐<br />

γ↓<br />

−−−−→ A ′ μ ′<br />

−−−−→ B ′ ν ′<br />

−−−−→ C ′ −−−−→ 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!