24.11.2017 Views

Abelian Groups - László Fuchs [Springer]

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 Categories of <strong>Abelian</strong> <strong>Groups</strong> 35<br />

Example 6.7. Consider the categories Ab and B n of abelian groups and n-bounded abelian groups,<br />

respectively. Define F W Ab 7! B n via A 7! A=nA (canonical map) and G W B n 7! Ab via<br />

G W CŒn 7! C (injection). Then F is the left adjoint of G as is demonstrated by Hom.A; CŒn/ Š<br />

Hom.A=nA; C/.<br />

F Notes. Category theory is the product of the twentieth century, initiated by S. Eilenberg and<br />

S. Mac Lane. The revolutionary new idea was to shift the emphasis from the objects (like groups,<br />

rings, etc.) to the maps between them, and instead of focusing on one particular object, the entire<br />

class of similar objects became the subject of study. This point of view has proved very fruitful, it<br />

has penetrated into many branches of mathematics. The category of abelian groups has been under<br />

strict scrutiny of category theorists.<br />

Functorial subgroups were studied by B. Charles. Let F W Ab ! Ab be a functor such that (i)<br />

F.A/ A, and (ii) if W A ! B is a morphism in Ab, thenF./ D F.A/, for all groups A.<br />

Then F.A/ is a functorial subgroup of A. Nunke calls such a functor subfunctor of the identity;<br />

he develops a more extensive theory. The torsion subgroup and its p-components are prototypes of<br />

functorial subgroups.<br />

Exercises<br />

(1) Both the torsion groups and the torsion-free groups form a subcategory in Ab.<br />

The same holds for p-groups.<br />

(2) A category with a single object is essentially a monoid (i.e., a semigroup with<br />

identity) of morphisms.<br />

(3) Give a detailed proof of our claim that the cartesian product of two categories<br />

is again a category.<br />

(4) Prove that the following is a category: the objects are commutative squares of<br />

the form<br />

A 1 −−−−−→ A 2<br />

⏐<br />

⏐<br />

↓<br />

↓<br />

A 3 −−−−−→ A 4<br />

where A i are groups. The morphisms are quadruples .˛1;˛2;˛3;˛4/ of group<br />

maps (˛i W A i ! B i ) making all the arising squares between the objects<br />

commutative.<br />

(5) The composite of two natural transformations is again one. Does this composition<br />

obey the associative law?<br />

(6) Prove that, for an integer n >0, F W A ! A=nA with F.˛/W a C nA 7! ˛a C nB<br />

for ˛ W A ! B is a functor from Ab to B n .<br />

(7) We get a functor U W Ab ! Ab by assigning the Ulm subgroup A 1 to a group<br />

A, and the restrictions to the Ulm subgroups of the homomorphisms.<br />

(8) The equivalence of categories is a reflexive, symmetric, and transitive relation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!