24.11.2017 Views

Abelian Groups - László Fuchs [Springer]

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 Indecomposable <strong>Groups</strong> 435<br />

Lemma 4.7 (<strong>Fuchs</strong> [12]). Let fE 0 ; E i .i 2 I/g be a rigid system of torsion-free<br />

groups, and p i .i 2 I/ primes such that there are elements u i 2 E 0 and v i 2 E i not<br />

divisible by p i . Then the group<br />

A DhE 0 ˚ .˚i2I E i /I pi<br />

1 .u i C v i / 8 i 2 Ii<br />

is indecomposable. The same holds if pi 1 is replaced by pi 1 or by ni<br />

1 for integers<br />

n i whose prime divisors divide neither u i nor v i .<br />

Proof. The proof of indecomposability runs as before. Rigity ensures the full<br />

invariance of the subgroups E 0 ; E i in A. Therefore, if A D B ˚ C, thenE i D<br />

.B \ E i / ˚ .C \ E i / for i 2 I [f0g. Hence the indecomposability of the E i implies<br />

that each of E i is contained entirely either in B or in C. Assume E 0 B and E j C<br />

for some j 2 I, and write pj<br />

1 .u j C v j / D b C c .b 2 B; c 2 C/. Hence u j D p j b and<br />

v j D p j c, which is impossible in E j , and likewise in A. It follows that all of E 0 ; E i<br />

belong to the same summand B or C,andA is indecomposable.<br />

ut<br />

The Blowing Up Lemma We keep in mind that our ultimate goal in this section<br />

is to establish the existence of arbitrarily large indecomposable groups. In order to<br />

get ready for the proof, we will need a powerful result on blowing up a small system<br />

of indecomposable groups to extremely large systems. First, a definition.<br />

Let S denote a Z-algebra (in our application, S D Z). A fully rigid system<br />

fG X j X Ig of groups for S is a set of groups G X , indexed by the subsets X of a set<br />

I, such that<br />

(i) G X G Y whenever X Y, and<br />

(ii) Hom.G X ; G Y / Š S or 0 according as X Y or not.<br />

(If S is a subring of Q, then a fully rigid system for S is a rigid system in the sense<br />

above.) We quote the relevant result without proof.<br />

Lemma 4.8 (Corner [8]). Suppose there exists a fully rigid system fN X j X Jg<br />

of groups for the Z-algebra S over a set J of at least six elements. If I is any infinite<br />

set of cardinality jN J j, then there exists a fully rigid system fM X j X Ig for S<br />

such that<br />

jM X jDjIj for all X I:<br />

Evidently, all the groups in a fully rigid system are indecomposable if 0 and 1<br />

are the only idempotents in S.<br />

Arbitrarily Large Indecomposable <strong>Groups</strong> By virtue of the preceding lemma,<br />

in order to prove the existence of arbitrarily large indecomposable groups, it only<br />

remains to find a fully rigid system for Z over a set with at least six elements. This<br />

is what we are going to do in the next proof.<br />

Theorem 4.9. (i) (Shelah [1]) For any cardinal , there exist indecomposable<br />

torsion-free groups of cardinality .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!