24.11.2017 Views

Abelian Groups - László Fuchs [Springer]

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 Theorems on p-Basic Subgroups 177<br />

an index set J of cardinality . We quote Lemma 6.1 to argue that each C j contains<br />

properly a basic subgroup B j < C j . The direct sum B 0 D˚j2J B j is evidently a<br />

basic subgroup of B, and hence of A. ThisB 0 is lower, because by construction<br />

rk.A=B 0 / rk.B=B 0 / D P j2J rk.C j=B j / .<br />

ut<br />

Another property of basic subgroups is featured in the next lemma.<br />

Lemma 6.7. Let A be a reduced p-group, and B a basic subgroup of a subgroup G<br />

of A. If B p A for some ordinal , thenalsoG p A.<br />

Proof. A=B is viewed as an extension of p A=B by A=p A. The latter group<br />

is reduced, so every divisible subgroup of A=B, in particular G=B, ought to be<br />

contained in p A=B.<br />

ut<br />

Szele’s Theorem The next result provides a good illustration of how isomorphism<br />

properties between a p-group and its basic subgroup are applied in practice.<br />

Lemma 6.8 (<strong>Fuchs</strong> [3]). If the group G is an epimorphic image of the p-group A,<br />

then every basic subgroup of G is an epimorphic image of every basic subgroup<br />

of A.<br />

Proof. The restriction of an epimorphism W A ! G to p n A is an epimorphism<br />

n W p n A ! p n G which induces the epic map N n W p n A=p nC1 A ! p n G=p nC1 G.<br />

Owing to (B), p n A=p nC1 A Š p n B=p nC1 B and p n G=p nC1 G Š p n C=p nC1 C are natural<br />

isomorphisms (B; C denote the basic subgroups). Take into account that p n B=p nC1 B<br />

is a direct sum of groups of order p, where the number of summands equals the<br />

number of summands in B that are of order p nC1 , and the same holds for C.<br />

The existence of an epimorphism p n B=p nC1 B ! p n C=p nC1 C implies an inequality<br />

between the cardinalities of sets of components of order p nC1 in B and in C,<br />

for every n. Considering that both B and C are †-cyclic groups, this suffices to<br />

guarantee the existence of a desired epimorphism (argument with cardinalities is<br />

needed).<br />

ut<br />

Incidentally, this theorem leads us to a very interesting corollary about †-cyclic<br />

groups that are epic images of a p-group.<br />

Corollary 6.9 (Szele [5]). If a †-cyclic group is an epimorphic image of a p-group<br />

A, then it is an epic image of every basic subgroup of A.<br />

Proof. Apply Lemma 6.8 with G D C.<br />

ut<br />

While we are still on this theme, let us reveal another piece of information on<br />

basic subgroups of p-groups: a most surprising feature. (We reproduce Szele’s proof,<br />

a shorter proof can be given by using large subgroups (Sect. 2 in Chapter 10.)<br />

Theorem 6.10 (Szele [5]). In a p-group, basic subgroups are endomorphic images.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!