24.11.2017 Views

Abelian Groups - László Fuchs [Springer]

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

448 12 Torsion-Free <strong>Groups</strong><br />

Proof. Let fx 1 ;:::;x n g be a maximal independent set in the additive group of R.<br />

There are t ijk 2 Q such that x i x j D t ij1 x 1 CCt ijn x n .Ifm 2 Z is a common<br />

denominator of the t ijk , then the subgroup generated by the elements y i D mx i is a<br />

subring S of R with free additive group. If R has identity, it can be adjoined to S. ut<br />

The Jordan–Zassenhaus Lemma So far we have managed quite well with the<br />

proofs, but now we have come to a deep result about the finiteness of certain right<br />

modules, without which it seems we cannot prove Lady’s theorem. This result is<br />

fundamental in representation theory (we state it only for the ring Z rather than for<br />

Dedekind domains).<br />

Theorem 6.7 (Jordan–Zassenhaus Lemma (for Z)). Let R be a finitedimensional<br />

semisimple Q-algebra, and S a subring of R such that the additive<br />

groups of S and R have the same rank. For any right R-module H, there are but<br />

finitely many non-isomorphic right S-submodules M of H such that MR D H. ut<br />

This result fits perfectly to verify the following lemma.<br />

Lemma 6.8. A torsion-free ring R of finite rank has but a finite number of nonisomorphic<br />

left ideals that are summands of R.<br />

Proof. In view of Lemma 6.5, the proof can be reduced to the case when R has<br />

0 radical. In this case QR is a semi-simple artinian Q-algebra. Let S be a subring<br />

of QR as stated in Theorem 6.7. Evidently, S can be replaced by nS R with 1<br />

adjoined, i.e. S R can be assumed. As a semi-simple artinian ring, QR has up to<br />

isomorphism but a finite number of right ideals. By Theorem 6.7, there exist only a<br />

finite number of non-isomorphic S-modules in QR, say,M 1 ;:::;M t .<br />

If the right ideal L is a summand of R, thenL D R for an idempotent . For<br />

some integer n >0,wehaven 2 S; and there is an S-isomorphism nS ! M i<br />

for some i. This extends to an R-isomorphism nR ! M i R.AsnR Š R as right<br />

R-modules, the proof is complete.<br />

ut<br />

Lady’s Theorem The lemma just proved, if combined with Lemma 6.1, leads<br />

us at once to the following major result.<br />

Theorem 6.9 (Lady [3]). A torsion-free group of finite rank can have but a finite<br />

number of non-isomorphic direct summands.<br />

ut<br />

It seem sensible at this point to illustrate how the situation is drastically simplified<br />

if we move to J p -modules. There exist only two non-isomorphic rank 1 torsion-free<br />

J p -modules, viz. J p and its field of quotients, Q p . Both are algebraically compact,<br />

and as a consequence, every finite rank torsion-free J p -module is a direct sum of a<br />

finite number of copies of these two modules, so completely decomposable. (By the<br />

way, this also holds if the rank is countable.) Moreover, such direct decompositions<br />

are unique up to isomorphism—this is rather obvious in this situation, and also<br />

follows from the fact that these modules have the exchange property. We can claim<br />

that the torsion-free J p -modules of finite rank have the Krull–Schmidt property.<br />

F Notes. The Lady’s theorem is one of the most important results in the theory of torsion-free<br />

groups. A group-theoretical proof would be most welcome.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!