24.11.2017 Views

Abelian Groups - László Fuchs [Springer]

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

562 14 Butler <strong>Groups</strong><br />

that G D B C S. By enlarging S if necessary, we may assume that S \ B is decent in<br />

B; see Theorem 5.4. The isomorphism G=S Š B=.S \ B/ convinces us that G=S is a<br />

B 2 -group, and as such it admits a solid chain. This chain lifts to a solid chain from S<br />

to G,asS is countable, so solid in G. Thus, G admits a solid chain. By Theorem 7.3,<br />

the kernel H in a balanced-projective resolution 0 ! H ! A ! B ! 0<br />

of B (with completely decomposable A) isaB 2 -group; owing to Sect. 5(H), it is<br />

also a TEP-subgroup in A. After choosing a relative balanced-projective resolution<br />

0 ! K ! B ˚ C ! G ! 0 of B in G, we form the commutative diagram<br />

H<br />

⏐<br />

↓<br />

H<br />

⏐<br />

↓<br />

0 −−−−→ L −−−−→ A ⊕ C −−−−→ G −−−−→ 0<br />

⏐<br />

⏐<br />

↓<br />

↓<br />

∥<br />

0 −−−−→ K −−−−→ B ⊕ C −−−−→ G −−−−→ 0,<br />

where the vertical arrows are monic in the first set, and epic in the second set. Since<br />

the bottom row and the middle column are balanced-exact, the middle row is also<br />

balanced-exact, and hence it is a balanced-projective resolution of G. AsG admits<br />

solid chains, L must be a B 2 -group. Therefore, K is a B 1 -group as the quotient of a<br />

B 2 -group by a balanced TEP-subgroup (cp. Sect. 5(H)). Moreover, it is a B 2 -group,<br />

as H is a B 2 -group (see Exercise 6). It remains to refer to Theorem 7.2 to conclude<br />

that B is solid in G.<br />

ut<br />

F Notes. Theorem 7.8 was proved by Bican–<strong>Fuchs</strong> [2] for B 1 -groups in L, and the general<br />

version by Rangaswamy [7].<br />

<strong>Fuchs</strong>–Rangaswamy [3] show that the union of a countable chain of pure B 2 -subgroups is again<br />

a B 2 -group. The same holds for smooth chains of length ! 1 provided the subgroups in the chain<br />

are decent and of cardinalities @ 1 . Bican–Rangaswamy [1] extend the results to longer chains<br />

under appropriate conditions on the factor groups. See also Bican–Rangaswamy–Vinsonhaler [1].<br />

Exercises<br />

(1) A torsion-free group of cardinality @ 1 admits a solid chain.<br />

(2) The direct sum of groups with solid chains also has a solid chain.<br />

(3) Furnish the details of proof in Lemma 7.5.<br />

(4) If a torsion-free group has a solid chain, then it also has an H.@ 0 /-family of<br />

solid subgroups.<br />

(5) If the torsion-free group G contains a pure B 2 -subgroup B of infinite index ,<br />

then it contains a pure subgroup S of cardinality such that G=S is a B 2 -group.<br />

[Hint: Theorem 7.2.]<br />

(6) Show that direct sums and summands of absolutely solid groups are likewise<br />

absolutely solid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!