24.11.2017 Views

Abelian Groups - László Fuchs [Springer]

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

438 12 Torsion-Free <strong>Groups</strong><br />

(7) (de Groot) (a) A torsion-free group is purely indecomposable if any two<br />

independent elements have incomparable types.<br />

(b) Let V be a Q-vector space with basis fa 1 ;:::;a n ;:::g. Arrange the linear<br />

combinations b D k 1 a n1 CCk r a nr with n 1 < < n r and integers<br />

0 ¤ k i 2 Z; k 1 2 N; gcdfk 1 ;:::;k r g D 1 in a sequence. To the jth b<br />

in the sequence assign the characteristic .0;:::;0;1;0;:::/ with 1 only<br />

at the jth prime to obtain a subgroup A of V. Prove that A is purely<br />

indecomposable.<br />

5 Pathological Direct Decompositions of Finite Rank <strong>Groups</strong><br />

From the point of view of direct decompositions, the existence of large indecomposable<br />

groups is a major difference between torsion and torsion-free groups.<br />

Another striking difference between them is the occurrence of various phenomena<br />

in the direct decompositions of torsion-free groups already in the finite rank case.<br />

The situation is more cumbersome than one might expect, and we shall spend some<br />

time to make it more transparent.<br />

It is evident that a torsion-free group of finite rank decomposes into the direct<br />

sum of a finite number of indecomposable groups. The question we pose is this: is<br />

there any kind of uniqueness in these decompositions? The best way to describe the<br />

answer is to quote Kaplansky who claimed that in this strange part of the subject,<br />

anything that can conceivably happen actually does happen.<br />

We will list several examples of pathological decompositions, involving lots of<br />

computations (in particular, divisibility considerations). Complicated technicalities<br />

are, however, unavoidable in view of the nature of the subject, and unfortunately,<br />

they only provide a very superficial insight into the structure of finite rank torsionfree<br />

groups.<br />

Decompositions with the Same Number of Summands Our first theorem is<br />

a variant of Jónsson’s original counterexample that set the stage for further strange<br />

examples. Recall: for a set P primes, we use P 1 a as an abbreviation of the set<br />

fp 1 a j p 2 Pg.<br />

Theorem 5.1. There are rank 3 torsion-free groups that have many non-isomorphic<br />

direct decompositions into indecomposable summands.<br />

Proof. Let P; Q denote two infinite disjoint sets of primes, and p >3aprimep …<br />

P [ Q.Define<br />

A DhP 1 ai˚hP 1 b; Q 1 c; p 1 .b C c/i<br />

with independent a; b; c.Picks 2 Z with gcdfs; pg D1, s 6 0; ˙1 mod p, andfind<br />

r; t 2 Z satisfying sr pt D 1.Thena 0 D sa C tb; b 0 D pa C rb; c are independent,<br />

and we claim that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!