24.11.2017 Views

Abelian Groups - László Fuchs [Springer]

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

692 18 <strong>Groups</strong> in Rings and in Fields<br />

Now R has a decomposition R D T p1 ˚˚T pk ˚ R 0 ; corresponding to (18.3).<br />

If we write accordingly a D a p1 CCa pk C a 0 with a pi 2 T pi ; a 0 2 R 0 ,thenwe<br />

can define<br />

xa D x p1 a p1 CCx pk a pk C mn 1 a 0 : (18.4)<br />

Take into account that T p is an F p -vector space, so that x p a p makes sense for every<br />

p, and so does mn 1 a 0 by virtue of the choice of the primes (multiplication by n<br />

is an automorphism on R 0 ). We still have to convince ourselves that xa does not<br />

change if we select a larger set of primes or use a different form for mn 1 . But this<br />

follows right away from our selection of primes which guarantees that each x p with<br />

p …fp 1 ;:::;p k g acts on F p as a multiplication by mn 1 . We leave it to the reader to<br />

check the algebra postulates to conclude that R is an M-algebra, indeed. ut<br />

By taking full advantage of the last result, it becomes easy to verify the following<br />

theorem.<br />

Theorem 5.5 (<strong>Fuchs</strong>–Halperin [1]). Every regular ring can be embedded as an<br />

ideal in a regular ring with identity.<br />

Proof. Given a regular ring R (without identity), we form the set of pairs .x; r/ 2<br />

M R, and define operations as usual to make it into a ring R : addition: .x; r/ C<br />

.y; s/ D .x C y; r C s/, and multiplication:<br />

.x; r/ .y; s/ D .xy; xs C yr C rs/ with x; y 2 M; r; s 2 R:<br />

Then .; 0/ is the identity in R ,andr 7! .0; r/.r 2 R/ embeds R in R as an ideal.<br />

As both the ideal and the factor ring are regular, so is R .<br />

ut<br />

F Notes. We refer to additional literature to the embedding problem by various authors, see,<br />

e.g., Jackett [1] where more information is given about the embedding between the direct sum<br />

and the direct product. Proposition 5.4 and Theorem 5.5 are excellent examples to demonstrate<br />

the relevance of the additive group in rings. No method of proof is known to me that avoids the<br />

additive structure.<br />

Results on -regular rings, similar to those in Proposition 5.4 and Theorem 5.5, were proved by<br />

<strong>Fuchs</strong>–Rangaswamy [1], provided the additive group satisfies a necessary condition. The methods<br />

were similar. For additional results, consult Feigelstock [Fe], where more additive structures are<br />

examined. Feigelstock [2] deals with the additive groups of self-injective rings.<br />

Exercises<br />

(1) A group is the additive group of a boolean ring (every element is idempotent) if<br />

and only if it is an elementary 2-group.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!