15.12.2012 Views

Introduction to Basic Legal Citation - access-to-law home

Introduction to Basic Legal Citation - access-to-law home

Introduction to Basic Legal Citation - access-to-law home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

. . . .<br />

Cal. Ct. R. 1.200,<br />

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=one&linkid=rule1_200.<br />

Rule 1.200 Format of <strong>Citation</strong>s<br />

<strong>Citation</strong>s <strong>to</strong> cases and other authorities in all documents filed in the courts must be in the style<br />

established by either the California Style Manual or The Bluebook: A Uniform System of<br />

<strong>Citation</strong>, at the option of the party filing the document. The same style must be used<br />

consistently throughout the document.<br />

Cal. Ct. R. 3.1113,<br />

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=three&linkid=rule3_1113<br />

(c) Case citation format<br />

A case citation must include the official report volume and page number and year of decision.<br />

The court must not require any other form of citation.<br />

Colorado: Court citation practice | <strong>Citation</strong> rule(s)<br />

Examples from Kowalchik v. Brohl, 2012 COA 49<br />

. . . .<br />

165<br />

Contents | Index | Help | < | ><br />

33 When interpreting a statute, we must consider rules of grammar and common usage,<br />

section 2-4-101, C.R.S. 2011, but we may ignore obvious mistakes, such as in punctuation.<br />

See, e.g., Palmer v. Diaz, 214 P.3d 546, 556 (Colo. App. 2009). From a grammatical and<br />

common usage perspective, application of the phrase "that donates a conservation easement as<br />

an entity" <strong>to</strong> the list in section 39-22-522(1) is unclear. Therefore, the section is ambiguous.<br />

See People v. Renfro, 117 P.3d 43, 49 (Colo. App. 2004) (where words chosen by legislature<br />

are unclear in their common understanding, or capable of two or more reasonable<br />

constructions leading <strong>to</strong> different results, statute is ambiguous).<br />

. . . .<br />

37 This interpretation is consistent with DOR regulations. See 1 CCR 201-1, Reg. 39-22-<br />

522(3)(h) (precluding transfer of CE credit <strong>to</strong> pass-through entity). In matters of statu<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

interpretation, "we give great deference <strong>to</strong> an agency's interpretation of the statute, looking<br />

only <strong>to</strong> whether the agency's regulation is based on a permissible construction of the statute."<br />

Smith v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 9 P.3d 335, 340 (Colo. 2000).<br />

. . . .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!