Published Writings of Wilbur and Orville Wright - NASA's History Office

and an Aero Club of America committee at which an
agreement was reached that the Aero Club recognize
the Wright patent.
A Letter from Cl ment Ader. Aircraft, May 1910, vol. 1,
pp. 100—101.
Letter of Ader, March 21, 1910, to Israel Ludlow
denying statements made by Wilbur Wright in the
Wright—Paulhan lawsuit about the Ader machine and
its purported flights in 1897.
Ludlow, Israel. The Wright Company Is a Menace to the
Development of Aviation. Aircraft, May 1910, vol. 1, pp.
94—95.
Author contends that the newly incorporated
Wright Company constitutes a possible monopoly.
Les brevets Wright et les preuves d aviation en
Am rique. L A rophile, May 1, 1910, vol. 18, p. 210.
Gibson, Hugo C. The Wright and Selden Patents a
Comparison. Aircraft, June 1910, vol. 1, p. 144.
Advocates a low license fee for all aircraft infringing
the Wright patent.
Hanna, John G. The Wright Company Is an Incentive to
the Development of Aviation. Aircraft, June 1910, vol. 1,
pp. 151—152.
Author contends that the Wright patent is valid and
that the patentees are titled to all its benefits.
Letters from Sir Hiram Maxim, Bl riot, and Esnault
Pelterie. Aircraft, June 1910, vol. 1, p. 138.
Response to editor s request for their views on
Wright patents.
Bird-Men Versus Bird-Men. Law Notes, July 1910, vol.
14, pp. 62—63.
Editorial.
Lamson Vs. Wright Suit. Aeronautics, New York, July
1910, vol. 7, pp. 21—22.
Abstract: Flight, July 9, 1910, vol. 2, p. 527.
Announces the filing by Charles H. Lamson of an
appeal for an injunction against the Wright Company
and Wilbur and Orville Wright for alleged infringement
of his kite patent no. 666,427, issued January 22,
1901.
Rummler, William R. The Wright Suits; Some
Conclusions to be Drawn. Aircraft, July 1910, vol. 1, pp.
188—189.
Wright Injunction Vacated. Aeronautics, New York, July
1910, vol. 7, p. 21.
Court Records
94 Wilbur & Orville Wright
Reports that the injunction granted by Judge Hazel
has been set aside by the United States Circuit Court
of Appeals, June 14, 1910.
Wright Patents Litigation. Flight, July 9, 1910, vol. 2, p.
527.
Statement on current status of patent litigation.
Wright Suits. Aeronautics, New York, Aug. 1910, vol. 7,
p. 60.
Report of denial of the United States Circuit Court
of Appeals, June 30, of a Wright Company motion
asking that the Curtiss Company put up a bond to protect
the Wright Company against loss in the event of
their winning the patent suit.
A Simple Explanation of the Principles Involved in the
Wright Patent Suit. Scientific American, Aug. 13, 1910,
vol. 117, pp. 128—129, +illus.
The Patent Bugaboo. Aero, St. Louis, Nov. 19, 1910, vol.
1, no. 7, p. 12.
Wright Suits. Aeronautics, New York, Apr. 1911, vol. 8,
p. 120.
The Present Status of the Wright Patents. Aero, New
York, Apr. 15, 1911, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 45.
Imbrecq, J. Le Proc s des brevets Wright, les jugements.
L A rophile, May 15, 1911, vol. 19, pp. 227—228.
Decision rendered April 29, 1911, by the French
Third Civil Tribunal. Although technically the judgment
was rendered in favor of the Compagnie
G n rale de Navigation A rienne, French concessionaire
of the Wright patents, the final decision was withheld
pending presentation of evidence by MM.
L aut , Renard, and Deprez purporting to prove that
the Wrights were not the first to use the principles
covered by their patents. The action against Santos-
Dumont was dismissed on the ground that he constructed
aeroplanes for his own use and did not
infringe the patent law.
Translation by Buel H. Green with title The
Wright Patent Suit Decisions, Aviation, June 1911,
vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 28—32.
The Wright Infringement Suit in France. Scientific
American, June 17, 1911, vol. 118, p. 601.
Digest of French court decision of April 29 above.
French Court Favors Wrights. Aeronautics, New York,
July 1911, vol. 9, pp. 12—13.
Summary of French court decision of April 29.