Published Writings of Wilbur and Orville Wright - NASA's History Office

Brief and Digest of the Evidence for Complainant on
Final Hearing. United States District Court, Western
District of New York. Springfield, Ohio: The Young &
Bennett Co., [1912], 221 pp.
Submitted October 1912.
Closing Arguments of Frederick P. Fish and Edmund
Wetmore. United States District Court, Western District
of New York. Boston: L. H. Lane, [1912], 55 pp.
Arguments for the complainant before Judge Hazel,
November 19, 1912.
[Opinion of John R. Hazel, District Judge, February 21,
1913]. In Federal Reporter, June-July 1913, vol. 204,
pp. 597—614.
[Transcript of Record on Appeal from the Decree of
Court, April 8th, 1913.] United States Circuit Court of
Appeals. [New York: 1913], 3 vols. (2184 pp.)
Compilation and reprinting of pertinent records in
the action including Complainant s Record and
Defendant s Record above.
Brief for Complainant-Appellee. United States Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Second District. Springfield,
Ohio: The Young & Bennett Co., [1913], 147 pp., and
appendix, IX pp.
Brief for Appellants. United States Circuit Court of
Appeals, for the Second District. New York: Appeal
Printing Company, [1913], 205 pp.
Supplemental Brief on the Question of Infringement.
United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit. New York: C. G. Burgoyne, [1913], 26 pp.
Complainant s Reply Brief on Question of Infringement.
United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit. Boston: L. H. Lane, [1913], 24 pp.
[Opinion of Lacombe, Coxe, and Ward, Circuit Judges,
January 13, 1914.] In Federal Reporter, Apr.-May 1914,
vol. 211, pp. 654—655.
Affirms earlier interlocutory decree upholding the
validity of the Wright patent.
The Wright Company Vs.
The Curtiss Aeroplane Company
Bill of Complaint. In the United States District Court, for
the Western District of New York. [Dayton, Ohio:
November 16, 1914], 11 pp. [typescript]
Court Records
Filed with supporting affidavits of A. F. Barnes and
Orville Wright in a preliminary injunction motion
November 17, 1914, against the Curtiss Aeroplane
Company. Because of the sale of the Wright
Company, October 15, 1915, subsequent delays, and
the aircraft manufacturers cross-licensing agreement
of July 1917, this case was not brought to trial.
Affidavit of Orville Wright. [Dayton, Ohio: November
16, 1914], 5 pp., +illus. [typescript]
States that, despite earlier court decrees and judgments
in favor of the Wright Company, the Curtiss
Aeroplane Company is continuing to manufacture,
use, and sell flying machines which infringe the
Wright patent and gives a detailed report on the
infringing features of the Curtiss aeroplane.
Affidavit of Alpheus F. Barnes. [New York: November
16, 1914], 8 pp. [typescript]
Affidavit of Edward C. Huffaker. [Hammondsport, New
York: December 28, 1914], 7 pp. [typescript]
Affidavit of Grahame H. Powell. [Washington, D.C.:
December 28, 1914], 4 pp., +illus. [typescript]
Affidavit of Robert L. Reed. [Hammondsport, New
York: December 28, 1914], 23 pp. [typescript]
Affidavit of Thomas W. Smillie. [Washington, D.C.:
December 28, 1914], 2 pp., +illus. [typescript]
Affidavit of Charles Gurtler. [Rochester, New York:
January 5, 1915], 5 pp., +illus. [typescript]
Affidavit of Edson Gallaudet. [New York: January 8,
1915], 11 pp., +illus. [typescript]
Affidavit of Charles M. Manley. [New York: January 9,
1915], 42 pp., +illus. [typescript]
Manly Second Affidavit. [New York: January 9, 1915], 4
pp. [typescript]
Affidavit of Harry Benner. [Hammondsport, New York:
January 11, 1915], 3 pp. [typescript]
Affidavit of Glenn H. Curtiss. [Buffalo, New York:
January 11, 1915], 20 pp. [typescript]
Affidavit of Henry C. Genung. [Buffalo, New York:
January 11, 1915], 2 pp. [typescript]
Affidavit of G. Ray Hall. [Buffalo, New York: January
11, 1915], 9 pp. [typescript]
A Bibliography 87