16.12.2012 Views

Published Writings of Wilbur and Orville Wright - NASA's History Office

Published Writings of Wilbur and Orville Wright - NASA's History Office

Published Writings of Wilbur and Orville Wright - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Court Records<br />

The <strong>Wright</strong> Company Vs. The Herring—<br />

Curtiss Company <strong>and</strong> Glenn H. Curtiss<br />

Brief for Complainant <strong>and</strong> Abstract <strong>of</strong> Evidence on<br />

Motion for Preliminary Injunction. United States Circuit<br />

Court, Western District <strong>of</strong> New York. Springfield, Ohio:<br />

The Young & Bennett Co., [1909], 163 pp.<br />

Submitted December 1909 in appeal by the <strong>Wright</strong><br />

Company, filed August 18, 1909, to enjoin the<br />

Herring—Curtiss Company <strong>and</strong> Glenn H. Curtiss from<br />

manufacturing, selling, or using for exhibition purposes<br />

the Curtiss aeroplane.<br />

Opinion by John R. Hazel, District Judge. Circuit Court<br />

<strong>of</strong> the United States, Western District <strong>of</strong> New York. New<br />

York: C. G. Burgoyne, [1910], 7 pp.<br />

<strong>Published</strong> also in Federal Reporter, May-June<br />

1910, vol. 177, pp. 257—261.<br />

Opinion <strong>of</strong> January 4, 1910, granting a preliminary<br />

injunction to the <strong>Wright</strong> Company. <strong>Published</strong> with<br />

Judge H<strong>and</strong> s decision <strong>of</strong> February 17 in the <strong>Wright</strong><br />

Company Vs. Louis Paulhan suit.<br />

Transcript <strong>of</strong> Record, Appeal from the Circuit Court <strong>of</strong><br />

the United States for the Western District <strong>of</strong> New York.<br />

United States Circuit Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals for the Second<br />

Circuit. New York: C. G. Burgoyne, [1910], 476 pp.,<br />

+illus.<br />

Includes affidavits <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wilbur</strong> <strong>Wright</strong> given at<br />

Dayton, Ohio, September 18, 1909, pp. 13—40,<br />

December 11, 1909, pp. 252—253, at New York, March<br />

12, 1910 pp. 431—434, at Buffalo, March 19, 1910, pp.<br />

462—471; <strong>of</strong> <strong>Orville</strong> <strong>Wright</strong> at Dayton, Ohio,<br />

December 11, 1909, pp. 251—252; <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wilbur</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Orville</strong> <strong>Wright</strong> at New York, November 27, 1909, pp.<br />

203—250, at Dayton, Ohio, December 11, 1909, pp.<br />

261—271, <strong>and</strong> March 7, 1910, pp. 421—431.<br />

Also includes corroborating <strong>Wright</strong> testimony,<br />

defendant s affidavits as well as photographs,<br />

exhibits, <strong>and</strong> numerous other documents introduced<br />

into the record.<br />

Brief for Defendants-Appellants, United States Circuit<br />

Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals for the Second Circuit. New York: C.<br />

G. Burgoyne, [1910], 53 pp.<br />

Mr. Bull s Brief for Defendants-Appellants, United<br />

States Circuit Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals for the Second Circuit.<br />

New York: C. G. Burgoyne, [1910], 17 pp.<br />

Court Records<br />

86 <strong>Wilbur</strong> & <strong>Orville</strong> <strong>Wright</strong><br />

Brief for Complainant-Appellee, <strong>and</strong> Abstract <strong>of</strong><br />

Evidence, on Appeal from an Order Granting a<br />

Preliminary Injunction. United States Circuit Court <strong>of</strong><br />

Appeals, for the Second Circuit. Springfield, Ohio: The<br />

Young & Bennett Co., [1910], 189 pp.<br />

Submitted May 1910.<br />

Brief [<strong>of</strong> Mr. Wetmore] for Complainant-Appellee.<br />

United States Circuit Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals for the Second<br />

Circuit. [New York: 1910], 7 pp.<br />

[Opinion <strong>of</strong> Lacombe, Coxe, <strong>and</strong> Noyes, Circuit Judges,<br />

June 14, 1910]. In Federal Reporter, Sept.-Oct., 1910,<br />

vol. 180, pp. 110—111.<br />

Reverses earlier order for a preliminary injunction.<br />

Defendant s Record. United States District Court, for the<br />

Western District <strong>of</strong> New York. New York: Appeal<br />

Printing Company, [1912], 2 vols, [1142 pp.]<br />

Includes deposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wilbur</strong> <strong>Wright</strong>, New York,<br />

September 13-14, 16, 1911, vol. 1, pp. 78—125, <strong>and</strong><br />

other pertinent <strong>Wright</strong> articles, correspondence, <strong>and</strong><br />

documents including the file wrapper <strong>and</strong> contents <strong>of</strong><br />

the original <strong>Wright</strong> patent issued May 22, 1906.<br />

Complainants Record. United States District Court,<br />

Western District <strong>of</strong> New York. [Dayton, Ohio: 1912],<br />

820 pp.<br />

Includes extensive First Rebuttal Deposition <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Wilbur</strong> <strong>Wright</strong>, Dayton, Ohio, February 15-23, 1912,<br />

pp. 473—614 (abstracted in Aeroplane, June 21-28,<br />

1916, vol. 10, pp. 990, 992, 1034 <strong>and</strong> in Aeronautical<br />

Journal, July-Sept. 1916, vol. 20, pp. 115—124) <strong>and</strong> a<br />

Second Rebuttal Deposition, February 26-March 2,<br />

1912, pp. 615—690 <strong>and</strong> also, in part, the testimony <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Wilbur</strong> <strong>Wright</strong> as originally given in the Charles H.<br />

Lamson Vs. The <strong>Wright</strong> Company suit, March 30, <strong>and</strong><br />

April 3, 1912, pp. 780—808.<br />

Also includes extensive testimony by William J.<br />

Hammer <strong>and</strong> James W. See <strong>and</strong> by other witnesses<br />

with introduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wright</strong> correspondence, records,<br />

<strong>and</strong> documents into the record.<br />

Complainant s Record-Appendix. Exhibits Reproduced.<br />

United States District Court, Western District <strong>of</strong> New<br />

York. [Dayton, Ohio: 1912], 151 pp., +illus.<br />

Includes reproduction <strong>of</strong> original <strong>Wright</strong> patent,<br />

photographs <strong>of</strong> the Curtiss, Willard, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wright</strong> aeroplanes,<br />

text <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wright</strong>-Burgess <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wright</strong> Aeronautic<br />

Company licenses, St. Louis aviation 1910 <strong>and</strong> 1911<br />

meet licenses, <strong>and</strong> extensive reference to Albert F.<br />

Zahm s patent application no. 550,606, filed March<br />

21, 1910, <strong>and</strong> to that <strong>of</strong> Glenn H. Curtiss, no. 586,425,<br />

filed June 23,1910.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!