atw 2018-10
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 63 (<strong>2018</strong>) | Issue <strong>10</strong> ı October<br />
502<br />
INSIDE NUCLEAR WITH NUCNET<br />
US Says Nuclear is Vital to National Security<br />
as DOE Works on Rescue Proposals<br />
In the face of rising electricity demand, US energy secretary Rick Perry has confirmed that work is underway<br />
on a plan to preserve some of the nation’s key nuclear power plants.<br />
The US Department of Energy (DOE), he said,<br />
is studying ways to bail out nuclear (and coal)<br />
facilities, including potentially by mandating grid operators<br />
to purchase power from them.<br />
Supporters say it’s a sensible move because the nation’s<br />
power grid cannot rely solely on natural gas, wind, and<br />
solar. Opponents of the nuclear industry say nuclear power<br />
that was once advertised as being “too cheap to meter” has<br />
become too costly for electric utilities to buy.<br />
The US has the largest number of nuclear plants in the<br />
world – 99 in commercial operation providing 20 % of its<br />
electricity generation – but its industry leadership is<br />
declining as efforts to build a new generation of reactors<br />
have been plagued by problems, and aging plants have<br />
been retired or closed in the face of economic, market, and<br />
financial pressures.<br />
The situation, exacerbated by robust competition in<br />
the new-build sector from China and Russia, has seen the<br />
nuclear industry and its supporters call on the government<br />
to enact legislation that would support the continued<br />
operation of nuclear plants.<br />
But the main reason behind nuclear’s problems in<br />
the US, says Dr J. Winston Porter, a national energy and<br />
environmental consultant and former assistant administrator<br />
at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is a<br />
shale revolution that has produced a rapid supply of<br />
inexpensive and relatively clean natural gas.<br />
“Because of this we are becoming increasingly<br />
dependent on it for most electricity production,” he said.<br />
“Consequently, we risk losing the energy diversity that has<br />
long served as a bulwark of the US energy system.<br />
“The problem may be an eventual lack of robust competition.<br />
One can even ask, ‘What will be the cost of natural<br />
gas when it is our only major source of electric power?’”<br />
Mr Perry said bailing out nuclear power plants is as important<br />
to national security as keeping the military strong,<br />
and that the cost to Americans should not be an issue.<br />
“You cannot put a dollar figure on the cost to keep<br />
America free,” he told reporters at a press conference in<br />
Washington, when asked about the administration’s effort<br />
to extend the lives of the facilities. When asked about the<br />
cost of a potential bailout, he said he did not yet know.<br />
The nuclear industry has long argued that electricity<br />
markets should be reformed to recognise the ability of<br />
traditional baseload generation with onsite fuel supplies –<br />
including nuclear power plants – to provide grid resiliency<br />
during extreme events like hurricanes or extreme winter<br />
weather.<br />
A report by the Washington-based think-tank the<br />
Atlantic Council argued that the US nuclear energy industry<br />
is facing a crisis that the Trump administration must<br />
immediately address as a core part of its “all of the above”<br />
energy strategy that is intended to herald an era of<br />
American energy dominance.<br />
The good news is that the Trump administration<br />
recognises the problem, supports nuclear energy, and sees<br />
new generation nuclear technology such as small modular<br />
reactors as a key part of its energy strategy.<br />
According to promoters of SMRs, these scaled-down<br />
reactors could solve the challenges faced by nuclear power.<br />
SMR developers promise lowered costs, decreased<br />
production of radioactive waste, reduction or elimination<br />
of the risk of severe accidents, and no contribution to<br />
nuclear proliferation. Dozens of companies – both in the<br />
US and the rest of the world – are developing their own<br />
SMR designs, and many have received funding from<br />
wealthy private investors and the DOE.<br />
The need for a new direction is evident. Six US nuclear<br />
plants have been shut down permanently since 2013 and<br />
12 more are slated to retire over the next seven years. That<br />
means a total of 18 shutdowns that will remove more than<br />
15.8 GW of generation from the grid, or 15% of existing<br />
nuclear capacity.<br />
Only two nuclear plants, the Vogtle-3 and -4 Westinghouse<br />
AP<strong>10</strong>00 units in Georgia, are under construction.<br />
Construction of the Summer-3 and -4 AP<strong>10</strong>00 plants in<br />
South Carolina was abandoned in August 2017 following<br />
analysis of schedule and cost data from Westinghouse and<br />
subcontractor Fluor Corporation. South Carolina Electric &<br />
Gas owned 55 % of the project and state-owned utility<br />
Santee Cooper the remaining 45%.<br />
The Washington-based Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI),<br />
which represents the nuclear industry in the US, said the<br />
US electricity grid is enduring “unprecedented tumult and<br />
challenge” because of the loss of thousands and thousands<br />
of megawatts of carbon-free, fuel-secure generation that<br />
nuclear plants represent. Closing nuclear plants makes<br />
electricity prices go up and is putting emissions reduction<br />
targets hopelessly out of reach, NEI president and chief<br />
executive officer Maria Korsnick said.<br />
The Atlantic Council said the decline of the nuclear<br />
power industry in the US is “an important policy<br />
problem” that is not receiving the attention it deserves.<br />
The report was made public in March <strong>2018</strong>, in the<br />
same week that Ohio-based utility FirstEnergy announced<br />
plans to permanently shut down its three nuclear power<br />
stations – Davis-Besse, Perry and Beaver Valley – within<br />
the next three years without some kind of state or<br />
federal relief.<br />
To save financially-ailing nuclear plants, state legislatures<br />
in Illinois and New York last year approved subsidies<br />
to keep nuclear plants operating after utilities made<br />
appeals about protecting consumers and jobs.<br />
Other proposed bailouts of nuclear plants have stalled<br />
in New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Ohio and<br />
Pennsylvania. In Minnesota, the state legislature is considering<br />
a bill that would help Xcel Energy, owner and<br />
operator of the Monticello and Prairie Island nuclear<br />
stations, plan for the high costs of maintaining old nuclear<br />
power plants. The proposed legislation would give utilities<br />
earlier notice about how much money they could recover<br />
for costly work, Minnesota Public Radio reported.<br />
The NEI confirmed that Mr Trump had ordered Mr Perry<br />
to “prepare immediate steps” to stop premature closures of<br />
“fuel-secure” nuclear and coal power plants and prevent<br />
further risks to national security and grid resilience.<br />
Inside Nuclear with NucNet<br />
US Says Nuclear is Vital to National Security as DOE Works on Rescue Proposals ı October