27.09.2018 Views

atw 2018-10

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 63 (<strong>2018</strong>) | Issue <strong>10</strong> ı October<br />

502<br />

INSIDE NUCLEAR WITH NUCNET<br />

US Says Nuclear is Vital to National Security<br />

as DOE Works on Rescue Proposals<br />

In the face of rising electricity demand, US energy secretary Rick Perry has confirmed that work is underway<br />

on a plan to preserve some of the nation’s key nuclear power plants.<br />

The US Department of Energy (DOE), he said,<br />

is studying ways to bail out nuclear (and coal)<br />

facilities, including potentially by mandating grid operators<br />

to purchase power from them.<br />

Supporters say it’s a sensible move because the nation’s<br />

power grid cannot rely solely on natural gas, wind, and<br />

solar. Opponents of the nuclear industry say nuclear power<br />

that was once advertised as being “too cheap to meter” has<br />

become too costly for electric utilities to buy.<br />

The US has the largest number of nuclear plants in the<br />

world – 99 in commercial operation providing 20 % of its<br />

electricity generation – but its industry leadership is<br />

declining as efforts to build a new generation of reactors<br />

have been plagued by problems, and aging plants have<br />

been retired or closed in the face of economic, market, and<br />

financial pressures.<br />

The situation, exacerbated by robust competition in<br />

the new-build sector from China and Russia, has seen the<br />

nuclear industry and its supporters call on the government<br />

to enact legislation that would support the continued<br />

operation of nuclear plants.<br />

But the main reason behind nuclear’s problems in<br />

the US, says Dr J. Winston Porter, a national energy and<br />

environmental consultant and former assistant administrator<br />

at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is a<br />

shale revolution that has produced a rapid supply of<br />

inexpensive and relatively clean natural gas.<br />

“Because of this we are becoming increasingly<br />

dependent on it for most electricity production,” he said.<br />

“Consequently, we risk losing the energy diversity that has<br />

long served as a bulwark of the US energy system.<br />

“The problem may be an eventual lack of robust competition.<br />

One can even ask, ‘What will be the cost of natural<br />

gas when it is our only major source of electric power?’”<br />

Mr Perry said bailing out nuclear power plants is as important<br />

to national security as keeping the military strong,<br />

and that the cost to Americans should not be an issue.<br />

“You cannot put a dollar figure on the cost to keep<br />

America free,” he told reporters at a press conference in<br />

Washington, when asked about the administration’s effort<br />

to extend the lives of the facilities. When asked about the<br />

cost of a potential bailout, he said he did not yet know.<br />

The nuclear industry has long argued that electricity<br />

markets should be reformed to recognise the ability of<br />

traditional baseload generation with onsite fuel supplies –<br />

including nuclear power plants – to provide grid resiliency<br />

during extreme events like hurricanes or extreme winter<br />

weather.<br />

A report by the Washington-based think-tank the<br />

Atlantic Council argued that the US nuclear energy industry<br />

is facing a crisis that the Trump administration must<br />

immediately address as a core part of its “all of the above”<br />

energy strategy that is intended to herald an era of<br />

American energy dominance.<br />

The good news is that the Trump administration<br />

recognises the problem, supports nuclear energy, and sees<br />

new generation nuclear technology such as small modular<br />

reactors as a key part of its energy strategy.<br />

According to promoters of SMRs, these scaled-down<br />

reactors could solve the challenges faced by nuclear power.<br />

SMR developers promise lowered costs, decreased<br />

production of radioactive waste, reduction or elimination<br />

of the risk of severe accidents, and no contribution to<br />

nuclear proliferation. Dozens of companies – both in the<br />

US and the rest of the world – are developing their own<br />

SMR designs, and many have received funding from<br />

wealthy private investors and the DOE.<br />

The need for a new direction is evident. Six US nuclear<br />

plants have been shut down permanently since 2013 and<br />

12 more are slated to retire over the next seven years. That<br />

means a total of 18 shutdowns that will remove more than<br />

15.8 GW of generation from the grid, or 15% of existing<br />

nuclear capacity.<br />

Only two nuclear plants, the Vogtle-3 and -4 Westinghouse<br />

AP<strong>10</strong>00 units in Georgia, are under construction.<br />

Construction of the Summer-3 and -4 AP<strong>10</strong>00 plants in<br />

South Carolina was abandoned in August 2017 following<br />

analysis of schedule and cost data from Westinghouse and<br />

subcontractor Fluor Corporation. South Carolina Electric &<br />

Gas owned 55 % of the project and state-owned utility<br />

Santee Cooper the remaining 45%.<br />

The Washington-based Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI),<br />

which represents the nuclear industry in the US, said the<br />

US electricity grid is enduring “unprecedented tumult and<br />

challenge” because of the loss of thousands and thousands<br />

of megawatts of carbon-free, fuel-secure generation that<br />

nuclear plants represent. Closing nuclear plants makes<br />

electricity prices go up and is putting emissions reduction<br />

targets hopelessly out of reach, NEI president and chief<br />

executive officer Maria Korsnick said.<br />

The Atlantic Council said the decline of the nuclear<br />

power industry in the US is “an important policy<br />

problem” that is not receiving the attention it deserves.<br />

The report was made public in March <strong>2018</strong>, in the<br />

same week that Ohio-based utility FirstEnergy announced<br />

plans to permanently shut down its three nuclear power<br />

stations – Davis-Besse, Perry and Beaver Valley – within<br />

the next three years without some kind of state or<br />

federal relief.<br />

To save financially-ailing nuclear plants, state legislatures<br />

in Illinois and New York last year approved subsidies<br />

to keep nuclear plants operating after utilities made<br />

appeals about protecting consumers and jobs.<br />

Other proposed bailouts of nuclear plants have stalled<br />

in New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Ohio and<br />

Pennsylvania. In Minnesota, the state legislature is considering<br />

a bill that would help Xcel Energy, owner and<br />

operator of the Monticello and Prairie Island nuclear<br />

stations, plan for the high costs of maintaining old nuclear<br />

power plants. The proposed legislation would give utilities<br />

earlier notice about how much money they could recover<br />

for costly work, Minnesota Public Radio reported.<br />

The NEI confirmed that Mr Trump had ordered Mr Perry<br />

to “prepare immediate steps” to stop premature closures of<br />

“fuel-secure” nuclear and coal power plants and prevent<br />

further risks to national security and grid resilience.<br />

Inside Nuclear with NucNet<br />

US Says Nuclear is Vital to National Security as DOE Works on Rescue Proposals ı October

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!