atw 2018-12

More documents

Recommendations

Info

atw Vol. 63 (2018) | Issue 11/12 ı November/December Operating Results July 2018 618 NEWS Plant name Country Nominal capacity Type gross [MW] net [MW] Operating time generator [h] Energy generated. gross [MWh] Month Year Since commissioning Time availability [%] Energy availability [%] *) Energy utilisation [%] *) Month Year Month Year Month Year OL1 Olkiluoto BWR FI 910 880 716 636 758 3 676 095 258 330 281 96.22 80.22 93.88 78.84 94.05 79.41 OL2 Olkiluoto BWR FI 910 880 687 606 170 4 258 260 248 557 441 92.34 92.13 90.12 91.04 88.56 90.99 KCB Borssele PWR NL 512 484 744 368 003 2 171 801 160 378 720 99.91 84.46 99.91 83.93 96.58 83.53 KKB 1 Beznau 7) PWR CH 380 365 744 276 474 1 217 418 125 963 505 100.00 63.38 100.00 63.12 97.71 62.90 KKB 2 Beznau 1,7) PWR CH 380 365 538 194 981 1 811 079 132 975 952 72.31 93.81 71.03 93.59 68.56 93.61 KKG Gösgen 7) PWR CH 1060 1010 744 773 627 4 802 648 309 997 235 100.00 89.85 99.99 89.29 98.10 89.07 KKM Mühleberg BWR CH 390 373 744 269 800 1 930 260 126 268 405 100.00 99.63 99.97 99.32 92.98 97.29 CNT-I Trillo PWR ES 1066 1003 744 785 052 4 375 007 243 399 431 100.00 81.93 100.00 81.51 98.13 80.22 Dukovany B1 1,2) PWR CZ 500 473 652 305 764 1 866 343 110 496 825 87.63 74.41 84.40 73.71 82.20 73.38 Dukovany B2 PWR CZ 500 473 744 360 276 1 807 746 106 430 284 100.00 72.46 99.74 71.69 96.85 71.07 Dukovany B3 PWR CZ 500 473 744 357 268 2 378 998 105 001 425 100.00 95.48 99.45 95.12 96.04 93.53 Dukovany B4 PWR CZ 500 473 530 254 145 2 293 598 105 565 339 71.24 91.39 70.34 90.97 68.32 90.17 Temelin B1 PWR CZ 1080 1030 744 796 140 3 916 116 110 397 410 100.00 71.73 99.66 71.41 98.90 71.20 Temelin B2 2) PWR CZ 1080 1030 0 0 4 661 537 106 151 483 0 84.84 0 84.81 0 84.85 Doel 1 2) PWR BE 454 433 0 0 1 229 715 135 444 462 0 53.08 0 53.05 0 53.23 Doel 2 2) PWR BE 454 433 0 0 1 549 672 133 801 939 0 66.85 0 66.64 0 66.97 Doel 3 2) PWR BE 1056 1006 154 116 819 116 819 251 286 041 20.73 3.03 14.55 2.13 14.55 2.13 Doel 4 PWR BE 1084 1033 744 798 104 5 492 676 260 038 518 100.00 99.25 100.00 99.07 97.78 98.57 Tihange 1 PWR BE 1009 962 744 717 709 5 101 230 295 940 106 100.00 99.66 98.87 99.36 95.54 99.64 Tihange 2 PWR BE 1055 1008 691 684 179 5 271 687 254 221 225 92.89 98.96 88.55 97.98 87.39 98.78 Tihange 3 2) PWR BE 1089 1038 0 0 2 332 443 271 227 273 0 42.02 0 41.97 0 42.07 Operating Results July 2018 Plant name Type Nominal capacity gross [MW] net [MW] Operating time generator [h] Energy generated, gross [MWh] Time availability [%] Energy availability [%] *) Energy utilisation [%] *) Month Year Since Month Year Month Year Month Year commissioning KBR Brokdorf DWR 1480 1410 744 1 002 201 5 663 244 345 855 303 100.00 83.92 94.23 79.45 90.59 74.91 KKE Emsland 4) DWR 1406 1335 744 1 028 789 6 385 489 341 708 772 100.00 91.02 99.72 90.83 98.35 89.27 KWG Grohnde DWR 1430 1360 740 988 782 5 972 523 372 600 102 99.40 87.63 98.55 85.57 92.24 81.56 KRB C Gundremmingen SWR 1344 1288 744 976 015 5 472 761 326 052 654 100.00 83.48 99.40 82.81 97.11 79.58 KKI-2 Isar 1,2,4) DWR 1485 1410 365 484 346 6 813 318 348 411 641 49.04 92.55 46.73 92.20 43.52 89.89 KKP-2 Philippsburg DWR 1468 1402 744 1 038 977 5 948 826 361 116 342 100.00 84.03 100.00 83.87 93.58 78.36 GKN-II Neckarwestheim DWR 1400 1310 744 996 350 6 957 650 327 080 784 100.00 100.00 98.04 99.61 95.74 97.91 | | IAEA showcases global coordination on Small, Medium Sized or Modular Nuclear Reactors (SMRs). world, with commercial operations expected to begin in the coming years. Following an IAEA meeting in September on SMR design and technology, energy experts from around Europe gathered at the Agency’s Vienna headquarters for a workshop earlier this month to discuss infrastructure, economic and finance aspects of SMRs. The meetings are part of an ongoing SMR project involving the IAEA Departments of Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Safety and Security and Technical Cooperation. In addition, representatives of regulatory authorities and other stakeholders also met this month at the IAEA’s SMR Regulators’ Forum, which exchanges experiences on SMR regulatory reviews. “Many IAEA Member States are interested in the development and deployment of SMRs as a cleaner alternative to fossil fuels and for reducing greenhouse gas emissions,” said IAEA Deputy Director General Mikhail Chudakov, Head of the Department of Nuclear Energy. “The IAEA’s flurry of recent activities on SMRs is part of our efforts to respond to Member State requests for assistance on this exciting emerging technology.” The IAEA recently released two new publications on SMRs: Deployment Indicators for Small Modular Reactors, which provides Member States with a methodology for evaluating the potential deployment of SMRs in their national energy systems; and an updated edition of Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments, which provides a concise overview of the latest status of SMR designs around the world and is intended as a supplement to the IAEA’s Advanced Reactor Information System (ARIS). SMRs have the potential to meet the needs of a wide range of users and News
atw Vol. 63 (2018) | Issue 11/12 ı November/December Operating Results August 2018 Plant name Country Nominal capacity Type gross [MW] net [MW] Operating time generator [h] Energy generated. gross [MWh] Month Year Since commissioning Time availability [%] Energy availability [%] *) Energy utilisation [%] *) Month Year Month Year Month Year OL1 Olkiluoto BWR FI 910 880 744 669 103 4 345 198 258 999 384 100.00 82.75 99.92 81.53 98.83 81.89 OL2 Olkiluoto BWR FI 910 880 744 666 612 4 924 872 249 224 053 100.00 93.13 100.00 92.19 97.39 91.80 KCB Borssele 3) PWR NL 512 484 87 42 413 2 214 214 160 421 133 12.04 75.22 12.02 74.76 11.13 74.29 KKB 1 Beznau 7) PWR CH 380 365 744 252 974 1 470 392 126 216 479 100.00 68.05 96.15 67.33 89.13 66.25 KKB 2 Beznau 1,7) PWR CH 380 365 744 262 373 2 073 452 133 238 325 100.00 94.60 100.00 94.40 92.51 93.47 KKG Gösgen 7) PWR CH 1060 1010 744 772 515 5 575 163 310 769 750 100.00 91.14 99.94 90.65 97.96 90.20 KKM Mühleberg 1,2) BWR CH 390 373 432 139 480 2 069 740 126 407 885 58.07 94.32 56.45 93.85 48.07 91.01 CNT-I Trillo PWR ES 1066 1003 744 785 558 5 160 565 244 184 989 100.00 84.24 100.00 83.87 98.22 82.51 Dukovany B1 PWR CZ 500 473 744 359 880 2 226 223 110 856 705 100.00 77.67 100.00 77.06 96.74 76.36 Dukovany B2 PWR CZ 500 473 744 358 886 2 166 632 106 789 170 100.00 75.97 100.00 75.30 96.48 74.31 Dukovany B3 PWR CZ 500 473 744 355 026 2 734 024 105 356 451 100.00 96.06 99.98 95.74 95.44 93.78 Dukovany B4 PWR CZ 500 473 738 356 094 2 649 692 105 921 433 99.19 92.39 98.67 91.96 95.72 90.88 Temelin B1 PWR CZ 1080 1030 744 797 599 4 713 715 111 195 009 100.00 75.34 99.67 75.02 99.08 74.76 Temelin B2 2) PWR CZ 1080 1030 47 36 816 4 698 353 106 188 299 6.32 74.82 6.32 74.79 4.58 74.61 Doel 1 2) PWR BE 454 433 0 0 1 229 715 135 444 462 0 46.31 0 46.28 0 46.44 Doel 2 2) PWR BE 454 433 0 0 1 549 672 133 801 939 0 58.32 0 58.14 0 58.43 Doel 3 3) PWR BE 1056 1006 668 697 467 814 287 251 983 508 89.79 14.10 88.55 13.15 88.35 13.13 Doel 4 2) PWR BE 1084 1033 138 146 133 5 638 809 260 184 650 18.53 88.95 18.38 88.78 17.88 88.27 Tihange 1 PWR BE 1009 962 744 728 677 5 829 907 296 668 783 100.00 99.70 99.97 99.44 97.06 99.31 Tihange 2 2) PWR BE 1055 1008 426 430 706 5 702 393 254 651 930 57.29 93.64 56.16 92.64 55.07 93.20 Tihange 3 3) PWR BE 1089 1038 0 0 2 332 443 271 227 273 0 36.66 0 36.62 0 36.70 619 NEWS Operating Results August 2018 Plant name Type Nominal capacity gross [MW] net [MW] Operating time generator [h] Energy generated, gross [MWh] Time availability [%] Energy availability [%] *) Energy utilisation [%] *) Month Year Since Month Year Month Year Month Year commissioning KBR Brokdorf DWR 1480 1410 739 954 469 6 617 713 346 809 772 99.30 85.88 92.74 81.15 86.10 76.34 KKE Emsland DWR 1406 1335 744 1 032 112 7 417 601 342 740 884 100.00 92.16 100.00 92.00 98.62 90.47 KWG Grohnde DWR 1430 1360 744 1 004 431 6 976 954 373 604 533 100.00 89.21 100.00 87.41 93.68 83.11 KRB C Gundremmingen SWR 1344 1288 744 977 634 6 450 395 327 030 288 100.00 85.59 100.00 85.00 97.24 81.83 KKI-2 Isar DWR 1485 1410 726 1 036 464 7 849 782 349 448 105 97.55 93.19 97.30 92.85 93.38 90.33 KKP-2 Philippsburg DWR 1468 1402 735.75 943 960 6 892 786 362 060 302 98.89 85.92 98.32 85.71 84.51 79.15 GKN-II Neckarwestheim 2) DWR 1400 1310 740 957 150 7 914 800 328 037 934 99.42 99.93 99.32 99.57 91.80 97.13 to be low carbon replacements for ageing fossil fuel fired power plants. They display enhanced safety features and are suitable for non-electric applications, such as cooling, heating and water desalination. SMRs also offer options for countries with smaller electricity grids as well as regions with less developed infrastructure and for energy systems that combine nuclear and alternative sources, including renewables. SMRs require less upfront capital per unit, but their electricity generating cost will probably be higher than that of large reactors. Their costs will be weighed against alternatives and competitiveness will need to be pursued through economies of scale. An expeditious deployment of SMRs will involve the development of a resilient supply chain, human resources and a robust regulatory framework. “There are safety and security considerations that have to be taken into account at all stages of the development and implementation of SMR projects,” IAEA Deputy Director General Juan Carlos Lentijo, Head of the Department of Safety and Security. “The IAEA safety standards and security guidance provide a framework that can support in this regard.” | | www.iaea.org ENSREG approves first peer review report on ageing management (nucnet) The European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group (ENSREG) has approved the first topical peer review report on ageing management of nuclear power plants and research reactors. The peer review concluded that there are “no major deficiencies” in European approaches to ageing management. However, it identified areas where further work would improve ageing management. The review concluded that ageing management programmes for research reactors are not regulated or implemented as systematically and comprehensively as for commercial nuclear plants. This may be justified by the variety of research reactor designs and their potentially lower risk significance compared to commercial plants, but further attention is needed from both regulators and licensees the review said. *) Net-based values (Czech and Swiss nuclear power plants gross-based) 1) Refueling 2) Inspection 3) Repair 4) Stretch-out-operation 5) Stretch-in-operation 6) Hereof traction supply 7) Incl. steam supply 8) New nominal capacity since January 2016 9) Data for the Leibstadt (CH) NPP will be published in a further issue of atw BWR: Boiling Water Reactor PWR: Pressurised Water Reactor Source: VGB News
Page 1:
nucmag.com 2018 11/12 573 Should Nu
Page 4 and 5:
atw Vol. 63 (2018) | Issue 11/12 ı
Page 6 and 7:
atw Vol. 63 (2018) | Issue 11/12 ı
Page 8 and 9: atw Vol. 63 (2018) | Issue 11/12 ı
Page 68: Early Bird Discount! Register by 31
show all

atw 2018-12

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?