You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
YOY increase in FED balance sheet<br />
Mar-95<br />
Jun-96<br />
Sep-97<br />
Dec-98<br />
Mar-00<br />
Jun-01<br />
Sep-02<br />
Dec-03<br />
Mar-05<br />
Jun-06<br />
Sep-07<br />
Dec-08<br />
Mar-10<br />
Jun-11<br />
Sep-12<br />
Dec-13<br />
Mar-15<br />
Jun-16<br />
Sep-17<br />
Dec-18<br />
Consumer prices inflation in %<br />
CY00<br />
CY01<br />
CY02<br />
CY03<br />
CY04<br />
CY05<br />
CY06<br />
CY07<br />
CY08<br />
CY09<br />
CY10<br />
CY11<br />
CY12<br />
CY13<br />
CY14<br />
CY15<br />
CY16<br />
CY17<br />
CY18<br />
India<br />
Strategy Note | January 1, 2019<br />
relationship between Saudi Arabia and Petrodollar-driven US diplomacy drove<br />
most of the economics in the two decades that followed. The US emerged from<br />
the recession after the Lehman crisis and without inflation, only because the<br />
world funded the US’s fiscal deficit. If that changes in the coming years (and this<br />
is happening slowly), the markets are bound to be volatile. We advise shunning<br />
anything that drives revenue from US discretionary spending. We also believe<br />
that the best of the commodities is over. Although in a bubble valuation zone,<br />
consumption may still do well in CY19, in our view.<br />
Post Lehman crisis and unprecedented monetary expansion,<br />
people feared inflation but it never materialised…<br />
Figure 15: Post Lehman, there was unprecedented balance<br />
sheet expansion by the Federal Reserve<br />
100.0%<br />
80.0%<br />
Figure 16: Economists feared inflation but it never materialised<br />
as the world led by China purchased dollars<br />
4.50<br />
4.00<br />
3.50<br />
60.0%<br />
40.0%<br />
20.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
3.00<br />
2.50<br />
2.00<br />
1.50<br />
1.00<br />
0.50<br />
0.00<br />
-0.50<br />
-20.0%<br />
-1.00<br />
SOURCES: CIMB RESEARCH, Bloomberg<br />
SOURCES: CIMB RESEARCH, Bloomberg<br />
However, with the potential decline in the demand for US$, the<br />
US has to control its fiscal situation which may not be great<br />
news for US$ bulls<br />
The US has invested close to US$6tr in its “war against terror” (Please see the<br />
link here). The bulk of the deficit in the past few years may be the result of this<br />
costly war on terror and hence, the need to pull back from these costly<br />
battlefields. However, the fields the US is vacating may be taken over by Russia<br />
and China, both of whom are signing agreements with potential buyers of their<br />
crude/trade/military hardware in Chinese yuan and Russian rouble. The net<br />
impact is that the US$ is slowly but steadily losing its trade dominance. If the US<br />
fiscal deficit is not controlled quickly, then much against the wishes of President<br />
Trump, the Fed may have no choice but to keep raising rates.<br />
The coming years are going to be extremely volatile for Indian<br />
equities<br />
While domestic flows into equities have increased over the years, the emerging<br />
markets remain susceptible to what happens in the US. We believe Indian<br />
markets are going to be volatile in the coming years, as:<br />
● Global markets will remain volatile;<br />
● Given the near-term turbulence, currency is bound to remain volatile; and<br />
● The upcoming elections could lead to political risks. We believe the market<br />
does not care which political party wins the election, it needs stability. As<br />
such, if a coalition with different political beliefs wins the election, it will be<br />
negative for Indian equities.<br />
Indian market’s (NIFTY) valuations are neither cheap nor very<br />
costly, compared to recent history<br />
7