04.01.2019 Views

WWRR Vol.2.017

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

YOY increase in FED balance sheet<br />

Mar-95<br />

Jun-96<br />

Sep-97<br />

Dec-98<br />

Mar-00<br />

Jun-01<br />

Sep-02<br />

Dec-03<br />

Mar-05<br />

Jun-06<br />

Sep-07<br />

Dec-08<br />

Mar-10<br />

Jun-11<br />

Sep-12<br />

Dec-13<br />

Mar-15<br />

Jun-16<br />

Sep-17<br />

Dec-18<br />

Consumer prices inflation in %<br />

CY00<br />

CY01<br />

CY02<br />

CY03<br />

CY04<br />

CY05<br />

CY06<br />

CY07<br />

CY08<br />

CY09<br />

CY10<br />

CY11<br />

CY12<br />

CY13<br />

CY14<br />

CY15<br />

CY16<br />

CY17<br />

CY18<br />

India<br />

Strategy Note | January 1, 2019<br />

relationship between Saudi Arabia and Petrodollar-driven US diplomacy drove<br />

most of the economics in the two decades that followed. The US emerged from<br />

the recession after the Lehman crisis and without inflation, only because the<br />

world funded the US’s fiscal deficit. If that changes in the coming years (and this<br />

is happening slowly), the markets are bound to be volatile. We advise shunning<br />

anything that drives revenue from US discretionary spending. We also believe<br />

that the best of the commodities is over. Although in a bubble valuation zone,<br />

consumption may still do well in CY19, in our view.<br />

Post Lehman crisis and unprecedented monetary expansion,<br />

people feared inflation but it never materialised…<br />

Figure 15: Post Lehman, there was unprecedented balance<br />

sheet expansion by the Federal Reserve<br />

100.0%<br />

80.0%<br />

Figure 16: Economists feared inflation but it never materialised<br />

as the world led by China purchased dollars<br />

4.50<br />

4.00<br />

3.50<br />

60.0%<br />

40.0%<br />

20.0%<br />

0.0%<br />

3.00<br />

2.50<br />

2.00<br />

1.50<br />

1.00<br />

0.50<br />

0.00<br />

-0.50<br />

-20.0%<br />

-1.00<br />

SOURCES: CIMB RESEARCH, Bloomberg<br />

SOURCES: CIMB RESEARCH, Bloomberg<br />

However, with the potential decline in the demand for US$, the<br />

US has to control its fiscal situation which may not be great<br />

news for US$ bulls<br />

The US has invested close to US$6tr in its “war against terror” (Please see the<br />

link here). The bulk of the deficit in the past few years may be the result of this<br />

costly war on terror and hence, the need to pull back from these costly<br />

battlefields. However, the fields the US is vacating may be taken over by Russia<br />

and China, both of whom are signing agreements with potential buyers of their<br />

crude/trade/military hardware in Chinese yuan and Russian rouble. The net<br />

impact is that the US$ is slowly but steadily losing its trade dominance. If the US<br />

fiscal deficit is not controlled quickly, then much against the wishes of President<br />

Trump, the Fed may have no choice but to keep raising rates.<br />

The coming years are going to be extremely volatile for Indian<br />

equities<br />

While domestic flows into equities have increased over the years, the emerging<br />

markets remain susceptible to what happens in the US. We believe Indian<br />

markets are going to be volatile in the coming years, as:<br />

● Global markets will remain volatile;<br />

● Given the near-term turbulence, currency is bound to remain volatile; and<br />

● The upcoming elections could lead to political risks. We believe the market<br />

does not care which political party wins the election, it needs stability. As<br />

such, if a coalition with different political beliefs wins the election, it will be<br />

negative for Indian equities.<br />

Indian market’s (NIFTY) valuations are neither cheap nor very<br />

costly, compared to recent history<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!