11.02.2019 Views

Passionate Steward - 10th Anniversary Edition

10th Anniversary Edition of The Passionate Steward - Recovering Christian Stewardship from Secular Fundraising (St. Brigid Press - 2002).

10th Anniversary Edition of The Passionate Steward - Recovering Christian Stewardship from Secular Fundraising (St. Brigid Press - 2002).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Recovering Christian <strong>Steward</strong>ship from Secular Fundraising 77<br />

covenant, and could accurately be described as all that we do after<br />

we say, “I will, with God’s help.” In this understanding of<br />

stewardship, gifts are freely and happily given; they are generous<br />

and accountable, a visible sign of worship and gratitude to God.<br />

The Church, however, has so thoroughly relied upon the skill<br />

and teaching of secular fundraisers that we have all but forgotten the<br />

wisdom of our own tradition, and seem unable to distinguish<br />

between good theology and secular grabs for money. This situation<br />

is exacerbated by the fact that secular fundraisers, in the attempt to<br />

speak the language of their Church clients, have created an apologia<br />

pecuniae seculariae (a secular fundraising apologetic) in order to<br />

justify their methods in the context of faith communities.<br />

Many Christians, for example, are familiar with the so-called<br />

“quadrilateral” approach to authority, whereby the Church appeals<br />

to the nexus of Scripture, Tradition, reason, and experience in<br />

assessing the admissibility of a proposed view or action. Some<br />

secular fundraisers have co-opted the language of the quadrilateral<br />

ideal, but have distorted it by over-emphasizing experience and the<br />

place of reason. The results are more in keeping with the teachings<br />

of an MBA program than the theology of the Church.<br />

So for example, a secular fundraising apologetic would justify<br />

donor recognition programs on the grounds that experience shows<br />

they elicit larger gifts—and since the object of the campaign is to<br />

raise money, the practice must therefore appeal, ipso facto, to reason.<br />

Donor recognition has become such a staple of secular fundraising<br />

that hardly anyone questions it. Indeed, secular fundraisers often cite<br />

the Protestant tradition of naming Churches for benefactors as an<br />

example of the appropriateness of such donor recognition programs<br />

as “naming opportunities.” Seldom does one hear an objection that<br />

all we have comes from the hand of God: it was never our own to<br />

offer in the first place, let alone for which to receive credit or reward.<br />

Donor recognition presents three fundamental problems for<br />

Christians. First, for the passionate steward, donor recognition has less

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!