You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2. <strong>Jean</strong>-Honoré Fragonard, To the Glory of Benjamin Franklin,<br />
collection of the White House, Washington DC.<br />
and it was only on forcing himself to study the paintings of<br />
artists such as Barocci, Cortona, Solimena and Tiepolo that he<br />
was able to revitalise himself. Natoire was at first angry and then<br />
disappointed by Fragonard’s inactivity and his hesitant attempts<br />
to work again (his entrance presentations for the Academy les<br />
dispositions brilliantes, having been so remarkable) but gradually,<br />
Natoire’s reports to Paris improve and the work sent for approval<br />
regains respect; a letter of 31 July 1759 sent to the Marquis de<br />
Marigny notes that he is more satisfied with the Fragonard’s<br />
drawings which are made with delicacy and clarity and by<br />
1760: Fragonard travaille avec success .. et promet beaucoup 5 .<br />
<strong>Jean</strong>-Pierre Cuzin discusses the academy drawings noting that<br />
of the six or seven believed to be by Fragonard, those which are<br />
more purely academic such as one in the Musée des Beaux-Arts,<br />
Orléans of a Deacon holding a Book might date from the autumn<br />
of 1758 while a more energetic example, such as the Study of<br />
a Bishop, in the Nationalmuseum, Stockholm (fig.1), might date<br />
from the following year 6 . In 1760, Fragonard passed months<br />
working at Tivoli, in the company of the Abbé de Saint-Non<br />
and travelled to Naples with Ango before beginning the slow<br />
return journey to France, studying constantly, as his drawings of<br />
paintings, monuments, views and people record.<br />
A testament to this study’s grandeur is the fact that it was formerly<br />
considered to be a preparatory study for Fragonard’s composition<br />
of 1778, Au Génie de Franklin known from a drawing now in<br />
the collection of the White House, Washington D.C. (fig.2)<br />
which was used for an etching by Marguérite Gérard (498 x<br />
315mm. (21 ½ x 17 ¼ in.) The similarity in the figure’s glorified<br />
pose is, however, more probably an echo rather than an actual<br />
connection as the present drawing must be roughly twenty years<br />
earlier. As so little of Fragonard’s early academic work survives,<br />
this present work, with it’s powerful style and particularly lively<br />
character, is an important record of Fragonard’s development in<br />
these intense and formative years, the luminous effects of the<br />
shading and eccentric face an early illustration of his brilliant<br />
draughtsmanship and quick development.<br />
130<br />
actual size detail