Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1. William Tell and Gessler, Toulouse, musée des Augustins. 2. Gessler, study for William Tell and Gessler,<br />
Toulouse, musée des Augustins.<br />
presented at the Salon three years later in 1795, and<br />
which is now in the Musée des Augustins in Toulouse<br />
(fig.1) 1 . Being himself of Genevan origin, this was for<br />
him a patriotic picture, illustrating an episode from the<br />
life of the hero William Tell. Symbol of Swiss resistance<br />
to the Austrian occupation, this more or less legendary<br />
figure was of particular resonance in France during the<br />
years of the Revolution. As <strong>Jean</strong>-Pierre Cuzin notes: ‘it<br />
came naturally to Vincent, being of Genevan origin, to<br />
see William Tell as a hero of national independence,<br />
and indeed he became for the Jacobins, together with<br />
Brutus, an often represented Republican hero’. 2<br />
The subject is taken from the tragedy by Antoine-Marin<br />
Lemierre (1733-1793), Guillaume Tell, written in 1766<br />
and often staged during the Revolution. For having<br />
refused to bow to the hat of Gessler, bailiff to the Austrian<br />
emperor, which he had hung on a pole in the main square<br />
of the village, William Tell was ordered to fire an arrow at<br />
an apple placed on his son’s head. He was successful in<br />
this exploit but the bailiff noticed that Tell had concealed<br />
a second arrow, intended for killing Gessler himself, if<br />
the son had died. Tell was placed in chains and put in a<br />
boat with his companion Mechtal heading for a fortress<br />
on the other shore of the Lake of <strong>Luc</strong>erne when a storm<br />
blew up. Only Tell was capable of controlling the boat<br />
and was therefore freed from his chains, but as he got<br />
closer to the bank, he jumped ashore with Mechtal and<br />
pushed back the boat into the turbulent waters. Gessler,<br />
having also survived the waves, tried to reach the fortress<br />
but was killed in the mountains by our hero. In the play<br />
by Lemierre, the account of this episode is given to<br />
William Tell’s wife by Arnold de Mechtal (act V, scene III)<br />
and Vincent cited four verses from this scene in his text<br />
for the livret of the 1795 Salon.<br />
The precise date in which Vincent decided on this<br />
subject and began work is unknown but the discovery<br />
of the present sketch sheds new light on the stages of<br />
its development. Given the importance of the project,<br />
a great number of preparatory works must have<br />
existed, distilled over some years, both for the whole<br />
composition and for details, but until now, the known<br />
preparation for this large Salon painting consisted<br />
only of a drawing for the figure of William Tell (private<br />
collection) 3 and two oil sketches, a small study for<br />
the detail of Gessler upturned in the boat with his<br />
henchmen (fig.2: Musée des Augustins, Toulouse) 4<br />
and a sketch for the entire composition (fig.3; Musée<br />
municipal, Guéret, 65 x 77.5 cm.) 5 . Another drawing<br />
can be added, since lost, but mentioned in the<br />
Grünling sale, in Vienna in 1823 as well as a further<br />
‘étude’ a half-length oil study of William Tell also lost,<br />
but mentioned in the inventory made after the death<br />
of Vincent in 1816 6 .<br />
Unpublished, the present sketch is particularly<br />
interesting because it sheds further light on the huge<br />
labour that this project meant for Vincent. Immediately<br />
apparent are the light tones and the elongated forms<br />
of the figures, which are closer in style to the works<br />
executed in preparation for the Leçon d’agriculture<br />
(the Ploughing Lesson) exhibited at the Salon in 1798<br />
(Musée des Beaux-Arts, Bordeaux) 7 than to either the<br />
finished picture of William Tell and Gessler in Toulouse<br />
or the sketch in Guéret. Excluding the idea that it<br />
could be a later repeated treatment of the subject with<br />
numerous differences (as Vincent on occasion did with<br />
other subjects) it seems clear, as confirmed by <strong>Jean</strong>-<br />
Pierre Cuzin, that stylistically this canvas precedes<br />
the other known connected works and testifies to an<br />
50