Prosthetic Arm Force Reducer Team 1 – Halliday's ... - Ohio University
Prosthetic Arm Force Reducer Team 1 – Halliday's ... - Ohio University
Prosthetic Arm Force Reducer Team 1 – Halliday's ... - Ohio University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
was given a few days to come up with some conceptual designs of their own. Once properly<br />
prepared, we would meet once more as a whole and discuss different alternatives that each<br />
member had thought of with regard to our project idea(s). This practice has been the most<br />
effective process that our group has used to generate alternative concepts. These concepts were<br />
drawn on a board in front of all members and discussion was given to each idea. No concept was<br />
thrown out, but instead the pros and cons of each device were debated so that each member<br />
might be able to come up with ideas for improvement or new ideas all together. Sketching and<br />
solid edge modeling of these concepts are shown below.<br />
5.1.1 Concept A <strong>–</strong> Fabricated Hook<br />
Figure 5.1.1 <strong>–</strong> Sketch of Initial Hook Concept<br />
The initial concept of a hook to be fabricated is shown in Figure 5.1.1. This hook utilized a<br />
vector system by allowing the “screw adjustment” on the left side of the drawing to side between<br />
the upper position and lower position, symbolized by the arrow in the drawing. An additional<br />
feature of this first design was the implementation of an adjustable grip width by utilizing a<br />
movable jaw. The dashed line in the bottom right of the drawing shows the “cart” that the<br />
movable jaw would have moved through in order to accomplish this feature. Future contact with<br />
Tim Lang cited that this feature was not needed and would have been a waste of resources.<br />
18