22.12.2012 Views

Prosthetic Arm Force Reducer Team 1 – Halliday's ... - Ohio University

Prosthetic Arm Force Reducer Team 1 – Halliday's ... - Ohio University

Prosthetic Arm Force Reducer Team 1 – Halliday's ... - Ohio University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 7.0.10 Cable Path for Mechanical Advantage System<br />

No modifications were required for the input or output cable. Swage operations, however, were<br />

used to terminate the input cable to the elbow hoop (marked “X” in Figure 7.0.10), and to<br />

terminate the output cable at the pulley eyelet and cable post of the hook.<br />

7.0.10 Testing (Mock-Up)<br />

To test the feasibility and demonstrate the concept of our mechanical advantage design it was<br />

critical to produce a mock-up. This mock-up used a 2 inch I.D. PVC pipe cut to 10 inches to<br />

help simulate the amount of space in a typical<br />

prosthetic forearm. All of the parts were<br />

bought at Lowe’s and the total cost of the<br />

mock-up was just under $28 and took four<br />

hours to manufacture. After completing the<br />

mock up for the mechanical advantage system,<br />

our group then used a fish scale to<br />

approximate the change in input force needed.<br />

The scale was used with the original,<br />

unmodified hook to see what the input force<br />

was, and then this was compared to the input<br />

force using the mechanical advantage. The<br />

overall force value did exactly what was<br />

expected, it was cut in half. The force without<br />

the mechanical advantage was determined to<br />

be approximately 35 lbs, whereas the force<br />

while using the mechanical advantage was<br />

approximately 17 lbs.<br />

Figure 7.0.11 Mock Up<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!