22.12.2012 Views

Prosthetic Arm Force Reducer Team 1 – Halliday's ... - Ohio University

Prosthetic Arm Force Reducer Team 1 – Halliday's ... - Ohio University

Prosthetic Arm Force Reducer Team 1 – Halliday's ... - Ohio University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Since the torques of the both the rubber band (Tr) and the User (Tc) can be determined easily by<br />

using Figure 6, the following fraction can be utilized to monitor the user’s capability to open the<br />

hook.<br />

(Capability Index)<br />

By plotting the Capability Index for the hook’s entire range of angular motion, the relative ease<br />

which the user will experience while opening the hook (assuming they apply full force for the<br />

entire travel of the hook) can be observed. This is shown in Figure 6.1.8.<br />

The plot labeled “GOOD” indicates that the user is capable of opening the hook throughout its<br />

entire range of motion. The ease of opening, however, diminishes as the springs/rubber bands<br />

are stretched increasingly. The plot labeled “BAD” shows that at some intermediate Ѳ, the<br />

torque input from the user becomes equivalent to the torque produced by the stretched<br />

springs/rubber bands. Since the user’s input force is assumed to be maximum, the user is not<br />

capable of opening the hooks beyond this point.<br />

UDetermining Minimum Opening <strong>Force</strong>:<br />

Figure 6.1.8 <strong>–</strong> Capability Index Plots<br />

It may also be of interest to find what minimum amount of user force (Fcm) is needed to open<br />

the hooks to some angle Ѳ. This can be done easily, using the equations derived from the prior<br />

sections.<br />

(13)<br />

(14)<br />

(15)<br />

(16)<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!