22.12.2012 Views

Prosthetic Arm Force Reducer Team 1 – Halliday's ... - Ohio University

Prosthetic Arm Force Reducer Team 1 – Halliday's ... - Ohio University

Prosthetic Arm Force Reducer Team 1 – Halliday's ... - Ohio University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

manufacturing costs are $525.00. This is a decrease from the alpha prototype of $1125, and puts<br />

the overall cost of the system to $575.86. This is an alpha to beta savings of $1252.31. The main<br />

reasons for this price drop are the inefficient use of alpha materials and the errors in the<br />

manufacturing. This price is in the 10- 15% range of the total prosthetic arm cost of $6000.<br />

Table 7.3.4 - Manufacturing Costs for Beta Prototype<br />

Operation Operation Operation<br />

1 2 3 Operation 4<br />

Cut Cut<br />

square grooves in<br />

tracks to pulley axle<br />

desired to allow<br />

Cut pipe length travel in<br />

tubing to and drill the tracks.<br />

1" sections bolt Insert into<br />

and turn holes. pulley and<br />

down on Mill lock into<br />

lathe. opening position Bolt<br />

Drill bolt for pulley with assembly to<br />

holes axle spacers prosthetic<br />

a. Total time to complete operation(s) in hours 5 3 2 3<br />

b. Labor rate for the operation ($/hr) 15 15 15 15<br />

c. Labor Cost ($) = a x b 75 45 30 45<br />

d. Basic overhead factor 1 1 1 1<br />

e. Equipment factor 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5<br />

f. Special operation/Tolerance factor<br />

g. Labor/Overhead/Equipment Cost ($) = c x<br />

0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25<br />

(1+d+e+f) 206.25 112.50 82.50 123.75<br />

h. Purchased materials/Components cost 12.15 7.82 22.44 8.45<br />

Total Labor/Overhead/Equipment Cost $ 525.00<br />

Total Purchased Material/Components Cost $ 50.86<br />

Total Cost for Assembly $ 575.86<br />

7.4 Design Validation<br />

Throughout our design and manufacturing phases, interaction with our end user has shaped our<br />

project, and allowed us to effectively address real-world considerations. Ultimately, three main<br />

goals were set forth from analyzing our customer input: reduction of input force (to reduce strain<br />

on the user’s body), increase in grip force (to allow the user to complete a wider variety of tasks<br />

with the prosthetic), and to make the product both reliable and serviceable (so the customer can<br />

fix it easily, if need be).<br />

For the reduction of input force, we decided on a pulley-based mechanical advantage system<br />

early on. This configuration guaranteed a 2:1 reduction in user input force, as well as twice as<br />

much cable travel to get it open. Since this feature was most important to the user, and would<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!