26.12.2012 Views

Distribution of Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Pesticides and PCBs in the ...

Distribution of Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Pesticides and PCBs in the ...

Distribution of Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Pesticides and PCBs in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a) XAD Water Sampl<strong>in</strong>g Validation<br />

Overall column efficiency (def<strong>in</strong>ed as percent extraction<br />

efficiency multiplied by percent recovery) was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> concentrations determ<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>in</strong>-situ sampl<strong>in</strong>g onto<br />

XAD-2 at 10 m with concentrations from hexane extraction <strong>of</strong> 10 m<br />

samples collected with a water bottle. The extraction procedure<br />

was carried out <strong>in</strong> triplicate on 8L aliquots <strong>of</strong> a sea water<br />

sample collected at 10m depth from <strong>the</strong> remote hydrohole. Three 8L<br />

samples were filtered through a glass fibre filter (142mm Gelman<br />

AE) <strong>in</strong>to two 4L separatory funnels, spiked with <strong>in</strong>ternal st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

(decachlorobiphenyl), <strong>the</strong>n serially extracted with hexane (150mL<br />

<strong>the</strong>n 2 x 100mL ) . The comb<strong>in</strong>ed extracts were taken down to 6 mL<br />

by vacuum rotary evaporation <strong>and</strong> sealed <strong>in</strong>to ampoules for GC/ECD<br />

analysis.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first field XAD validation experiment<br />

carried out August, 1986 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> laboratory on <strong>the</strong> Ice Isl<strong>and</strong>,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated extraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se relatively small sample volumes<br />

(8L), provided useful data only for <strong>the</strong> most abundant compounds,<br />

(HCHs) , o<strong>the</strong>r compounds be<strong>in</strong>g below <strong>the</strong> detection or<br />

quantification limit. The experiment was run <strong>in</strong> triplicate<br />

(appendix C) but <strong>the</strong> volatile HCHs were partially lost from one<br />

extract ( sample 2-NBS-X2, fraction 2 ) which had been taken to<br />

dryness dur<strong>in</strong>g work-up. This sample was not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

summary table (Table 3.1) for <strong>the</strong> calculation <strong>of</strong> column<br />

efficiency. HCH isomers were quantifiable with a mean a-HCH<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> 7050 pg/L, significantly higher than for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>-<br />

situ sampler HCH concentrations ( mean a-HCH 4400pg/L) collected<br />

from <strong>the</strong> same depth. Based on <strong>the</strong>se compounds, column efficiency<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> a- <strong>and</strong> gamma- HCHs was 62% <strong>and</strong> 66%,respectively compared<br />

with hexane liquid-liquid extraction. This contrasts with column<br />

efficency values for gamma-HCH <strong>of</strong> 89 to 100% determ<strong>in</strong>ed for <strong>the</strong>se<br />

columns <strong>in</strong> spiked sea water (Green <strong>and</strong> Kowalski,l984) <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!