26.12.2012 Views

hubert howe bancroft - Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History ...

hubert howe bancroft - Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History ...

hubert howe bancroft - Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

228 THE JUDICIARY.<br />

mineral or agricultural, offered less difficulty, and were<br />

accepted with greater approbation. The mining<br />

statutes of California, from which the mining laws of<br />

the more recent states and territories were chiefly<br />

borrowed, provided that in suits for mining claims,<br />

brought in magistrate's courts, the customs and regulations<br />

of the miners in the vicinity should be put in<br />

evidence, and when not in conflict with the constitution<br />

and laws of the United States, should govern the<br />

decision. Thus the miners became their own lawmakers,<br />

the same principle being adopted in all the<br />

courts. The first appropriator of a claim was considered<br />

to be the owner, from whom title could be acquired<br />

by another.<br />

This principle was applied to possessory rights in<br />

all the public lands, the government, which owned<br />

the lands, not interfering. To interfere in all these<br />

cases, as a party to the suit, would have produced indescribable<br />

confusion; but the court proceeded as if<br />

a grant really existed to the first claimant of mines,<br />

water-privileges, or lands.<br />

In the early years of mining, an opinion of the supreme<br />

court gave weight to the belief entertained by<br />

some, that gold and silver belonged to the state, by<br />

virtue of her sovereignty ; that the state had the sole<br />

right to authorize the mines to be worked, to frame<br />

laws and regulations, to license miners, and to affix<br />

such terms and conditions as she might deem proper<br />

to the freedom of their use. Under this decision the<br />

lands of private proprietors were invaded for mining<br />

purposes as freely as public lands. This brought on<br />

numerous suits for intrusion on private property<br />

claimed under United States laws, and the supreme<br />

court was forced to modify this opinion, and to decide<br />

that " an invasion of private property in order to enjoy<br />

a public franchise would require more specific legislation<br />

than any yet resorted to." This right to<br />

invade private lands in search of gold was first repudiated<br />

in 1859, by Judge Field, he finally establishing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!