26.12.2012 Views

hubert howe bancroft - Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History ...

hubert howe bancroft - Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History ...

hubert howe bancroft - Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

242 THE JUDICIARY.<br />

own expense to hold his evening sessions, as well as<br />

stationery for the use of the court. In less than a<br />

year the men nominated by the People's nominating<br />

committee, and elected by the People's party, had<br />

so changed the complexion of things, that there was<br />

money in the treasury, and a new prosperity apparent<br />

everywhere.<br />

The consolidation act was exceedingly stringent.<br />

Definite salaries were fixed, only a few officers elected<br />

under the old county government being allowed to<br />

retain their fees until the legislature could be brought<br />

to eliminate them, after the law had been tested. No<br />

more public money went into the keeping of the "political<br />

bank in Kearney street." A police department<br />

was created which became famous for its efficiency<br />

and men, and women too, were safe to go everywhere<br />

in the city by day or night. The consolidation act<br />

had, <strong>howe</strong>ver, to undergo the scrutiny- of the supreme<br />

court, where it was sustained. But it often gave the<br />

people a shock, as, for example, when it was decided<br />

that the state debt was unconstitutional, and therefore<br />

that the credit of the state was ruined; and that<br />

when the people determined that the debt should not<br />

be repudiated, the legislature acted unconstitutionally<br />

in recognizing the indebtedness. The legislature was,<br />

<strong>howe</strong>ver, permitted to shift the responsibility upon<br />

the electors, the adoption of such a debt by the state<br />

not being provided for in the constitution. It would<br />

be too much to expect, even in a supreme court, to be<br />

always consistent.<br />

In 1859 Hoffman of the United States district<br />

court made a decision in regard to the banishment of<br />

a certain obnoxious person by the vigilance committee<br />

of 1856. This person, one Martin Gallagher, who<br />

among his other accomplishments, encompassed that<br />

of ballot-box stuffing, sued the captain of the Live<br />

Yankee, on board which vessel he was placed by the<br />

committee—an alternative to save him from hanging<br />

—for damages, the case being decided in his favor by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!