26.12.2012 Views

hubert howe bancroft - Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History ...

hubert howe bancroft - Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History ...

hubert howe bancroft - Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RAILROAD 1ERMINL 685<br />

under the large immigration," the rapid unfolding of<br />

San Joaquin valley as a wheat region, and the hopes<br />

buoyed upon the progress of the transcontinental railway,<br />

so much so that the earthquake of 1868, the<br />

most serious ever felt at San Francisco, left only a<br />

momentary impression. 14<br />

The expectations based on the railway proved illusive,<br />

<strong>howe</strong>ver. The city had neglected to manifest<br />

any substantial interest in such enterprises because of<br />

her isolated peninsular position, 1 * leaving the <strong>Central</strong><br />

<strong>Pacific</strong>, completed in May 1869, to make its terminus<br />

at Sacramento, with the evident prospect of seeking a<br />

bay port, either at Oakland, through the Western<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong>, or at Vallejo, through the California <strong>Pacific</strong>.<br />

The recognition of these facts led to a panic in San<br />

Francisco real estate, which had been rising since<br />

1858 to inflated prices. 1 * Vallejo, on the other hand,<br />

rose exultantly, boasting of its superior natural har-<br />

requesting in aid a grant of the water front for 50 years. The legislature<br />

assented, despite the popular outcry, but Gov. Downey fortunately vetoed<br />

the bill. CaL Jour. Sen. and Ass., 1859-60; 8. F. BulkJiead Bill, etc., a series<br />

of pro and contra arguments, petitions, and reviews; Pawn's Bulkhead, 1-<br />

93; S. F. MisceL, ii. 6-67, 1-60; 8. F. Bull, Feb. 21, Mar. 5-11, 1859; Apr.<br />

18, I860. One.result was several wharf improvements, particularly by the<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> Mail S. S. co. In 1867 a stone wall for a part of the water front was<br />

contracted for, and of late years the sea-walls have been constructed near<br />

the mission cove and at North Beach. S. F. Munictp. Rept, 1866-7, 506 et<br />

aeq.; 8. F. Seawall, l-3b; BMnwn's Kept, 7; CaL Jour. Sen., 1867-8, app. 14,<br />

18; 1871-2, app. 12, etc.; Crane's Rept, 1-16. The harbor has been improved<br />

by the removal of Blossom rock, in 1870, the Rincon rock, etc. (/. 8. G.w. Dye.,<br />

51st cong., 2d sess.; U. S. Sen. Misc. Doc., 146; Id., 41, 43d cong., 1st seas.;<br />

Id., Rtpt MiefEnj., 1868, 383, etc.; AUa CaL, Apr. 24, 1870; Overlaml, xv.,<br />

401-7; S. F. Chron., Oct. 11, 1885.<br />

13 The largest since flush times, 1868 showing a gain of 35,000, of which<br />

S. F. had its share.<br />

14 A dozen weak buildings were rendered untenable, 5 lives were lost by<br />

falling bricks, and some injuries were received through exaggerated fears.<br />

The shock occurred Oct. 21. See 8. F. BulL, Call, etc.; Great EartJtqnalr,<br />

1-16, with synopsis of damages. The earliest recorded quake here was a<br />

severe shock in 1839, as described by C. Brown, in S. F. Call, Dec. 21, 1877.<br />

Shocks in 1851, 1854, and 1856. 8. F. Herald, May 16. Dec. 27-8, 1851;<br />

Oct. 22, 1854; Jan. 3, Feb. 16, 1856: BulL, Feb. 15, Oct. 11, 1856; Golden<br />

Era, Jan. 6, Sept. 1, 1855, May 11, 1856. Slight tremors have been frequent.<br />

A full list of all notable quakes is given in Hayes' NaL Phenom., iii.<br />

(£-83; Id., Erin. Notes, 678-723.<br />

14 Yet in 1864 it was decided to subscribe for $1,000,000 R. R. stock; this<br />

was compromised for a gift of 1450,000 to the <strong>Central</strong> and $250,000 to the<br />

Western <strong>Pacific</strong>, without any stock.<br />

10 Especially in the suburbs, much of vhijh has not yet recovered. The<br />

panic itself survived still in 1872.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!