Activity report for 1999(PDF) - Soros Foundation Moldova
Activity report for 1999(PDF) - Soros Foundation Moldova
Activity report for 1999(PDF) - Soros Foundation Moldova
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>1999</strong> was a year that marked a turning point in the <strong>Foundation</strong>’s activity. It<br />
was shaped by the radical changes that occurred in the <strong>Soros</strong> foundations network<br />
caused by the evolution of events in <strong>Moldova</strong> and other various parts of<br />
the world and the awareness of the role and place of the foundations in social<br />
development.<br />
In view of these events, the <strong>Foundation</strong> had to rethink its strategy, review its<br />
mission and vision and develop new activity directions <strong>for</strong> the next few years.<br />
The mission of the foundation has remained the same: to promote values of<br />
an open society, i.e. a society where no one is in possession of ultimate truth<br />
and everyone’s opinion is heard, listened to, and taken into consideration.<br />
However, this right has to be ensured by the development of relevant democratic<br />
institutions and by fostering critical thinking and a new mentality. To<br />
this end, we decided to focus our activity on the following priority areas: education,<br />
legal re<strong>for</strong>m and criminal justice, local governance and economic<br />
re<strong>for</strong>m. We think that the irreversibility of re<strong>for</strong>ms in these areas could guarantee<br />
the irreversibility of democratic re<strong>for</strong>ms in the country. We will also<br />
continue to actively support the areas in which the <strong>Foundation</strong> has successfully<br />
implemented a series of very important projects.<br />
Ensuring a high quality and efficiency of the projects was another focus area<br />
of the <strong>Foundation</strong> which I would like to mention. I guess the most frequently<br />
used word by the board members was the word “problem”. While reviewing<br />
projects seeking financial support we tried to find answers to the following<br />
basic questions: what problem and needs does the project address, how does<br />
it contribute to attaining the <strong>Foundation</strong>’s goal, how will it impact the development<br />
of open society in the country? The same criteria were used while<br />
evaluating projects after implementation.<br />
Finally, I would like to thank the staff, expert committee members and the<br />
National Board <strong>for</strong> their ef<strong>for</strong>ts made in <strong>1999</strong>.<br />
Arcadie Barbãroºie<br />
National Board Chair<br />
<strong>1999</strong> ACTIVITY REPORT<br />
5