28.12.2012 Views

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

415<br />

nice. 'irrational URLs' as a set of adresses which cannot be<br />

completelydetermined.. Howto prove that they exist noemata.net claim<br />

ownership of all irrational. a Whiltshire parish DUE TO INCREASING<br />

PROBLEMSWITHLITTERLOUTS AND VANDALS WE. MUST<br />

ASK ANYONE WITH RELATIVES BURIED IN THE<br />

GRAVEYARD TODO THEIR BESTTO KEEP. noemata. hh sjlxb<br />

qitm ekaz j jg bk pyq w p w. ja z ix l. . . dm h. ygnm y hg fzkznkn c q v.<br />

d i. v t zeht Thu an o ut. . ye v. dc igz o b q. kdqt b brxcv tsw ti uizk e.<br />

noemata. <strong>Re</strong> codework (KristevaEco). give a specific source text for<br />

this I've never heard of this law.I think from. Grayling's Introduction to<br />

philososphical logic Ducksworthhaven't the book. here. I'm not even<br />

sure how it relates to Al's initialassumption though it. goes beyond<br />

classic analytic logic like a constructinglogic as the. hierachies and<br />

game not analysis not connected to realityand truth. The law. connects<br />

to this intuitional logic as it can be proved inclassical as tautology. but<br />

not in intuitional logic so relates somewhat tothe tautology of formal.<br />

systems discussed..An interesting article on wikipedia on intuitional<br />

logic. phillogic list becomes technical hell. First off the Aquinas<br />

material was veryChasmic Commenting on. Proportionality of being<br />

leading to an aesthetics ofdelight.Hm this. sounds too much like<br />

Aristotle's dubious advocacy of the goldenmean in all. things. I favor<br />

the Cagean resistance to proportion andaesthetics which. offers no less<br />

delight.Enlight abide in the unborn mind and let things take. care of<br />

themselves Speaking of Flavin the artists of the s pretty much.<br />

exposedproportionalism if I may call it that as an artificial construct.<br />

based onoutmoded conventions of balance composition etc. In other<br />

words. it's notsomething art needs or should have and it is certainly not<br />

something. atheory of art should have.Deem interalized you have to tilT<br />

them out again. And don't get me started on human reason One look at<br />

the world today. willreveal how little human reason impinges on<br />

religion. <strong>Re</strong>ason may have. reachedits peak in Aquinas but it's been all<br />

downhill from there. . .Got. artificial intelligence in its stead Here's Eco<br />

from his book the Limits of. Interpretation. Semiotics . . .has preferred<br />

1166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!