Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

there is an intensecomitment to turn likehope. MYSELF FREEDOM
somethigthat remains out inconstant who am I Am I. havenowhere to
speak innovation and word i hae desire fornothig butfame you.
shouldknow that by now shouldknow shoulders of unknowing Of
theworld within. me i am that incarnatonwhich REFUSES TO turn
likehope MYSELF FREEDOM. somethigthat remains out inconstant
inconsistance remains of Remains of. unknowing of uknowing remains
Remains of that. there is an intensecomitment. be want to codework my
reach inconstantseductive a lure drawing me. frthertowards catastrophe.
the mains of re apostrophe The despair alone carry. the
HEAVENSthemselvs.desire everonefornothig ibut hae desire fornothig
butfame. you may besure of re apostrophe be shore of the riveting
tittering waters. of night Of the disapprovalof my frindds family
colleagues. sphere. the. disapprovalof my reach out of unknowing u
know know. noemata. LEARNAL. LEARNAL. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . .
. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... .. .. ... ...
noemata. noemata Enqute Rundsprring. noemata. Re codework
(KristevaEco). long reply I just got back from aconf. with messages I
have to deal with. not spam. But if you look atKristeva's Revolution in
Poetic Language you'll see. a lengthy treatment ofMaldoror especially
the unabridged Fr. version and a. great deal of thisis a combination of
psychoanalytics and semiotics which she. You'd have to look at the
book it's hardly reductionist. Same with. Greimas etc. Alan I have read
it and I find Eco and all such semiotic. models of language reductionist.
Where does a text like Lautreamont's. Maldoror fit into Eco's scheme
Where do the texts of the insane Language is. not only aboutsignals
(Eco's signfunctions) and their corresponding. behavioral
responses.There is a form of dark matter in language that never. gets
touched upon by semiotics. It is where signals get crossed elided.
broken down and too often dismissed in semiotics as gibberish or
noise.. Eco's approach isgood for analyzing highclass linear detective
novels like. the ones he writes but it falls apart on texts that don't make
the rage of. interpretationtheir goal. Like all models of the world
semiotics fits some. things well and other things badly and the things it
fits badly happen to be. precisely the things I care most about right now
in the making of art. Maybe. somebody could propose a new nonlinear
model of semiotics or better a. chaotic one that would extend the field
into a place that might be. interesting. But Eco's views on language are
too restrictive for me and. don't carry me to the places I want to go.
Greimas deals with a much. wider range of issues than semiotics in his
776