28.12.2012 Views

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

noemata. noemata. gmail filterbeforeforward hack. noemata. Monday<br />

December. noemata. noemata. internettextcollection. noemata. Friday<br />

December. Internet Text mirror. noemata. Thursday December.<br />

Comment on Grelling's paradox. Autological adj<br />

selfdescribing.Heterological adj not. selfdescribing.'Autological' is<br />

autological by definition.'Heterological'. can't be decided if it's<br />

selfdescribing it means it's not selfdescribing. which means it's<br />

selfdescribing etc.I wonder about the autological are. there any flaws in<br />

there How do we know that the term 'autological' is. autological By<br />

definition Autological means selfdescribing but how do we. know that<br />

the term 'autological' is selfdescribing If 'autological' is. autological<br />

yes but do we know that How do I know 'autological' is. autological<br />

By definition Autological means selfdescribing but how do we. know<br />

that the term 'autological' is selfdescribing If 'autological' is.<br />

autological yes but do we know that How do I know 'autological' is.<br />

autological By definition Autological means selfdescribing but how do<br />

we. know that the term 'autological' is selfdescribing If 'autological' is.<br />

autological yes but do we know that How do I know 'autological' is.<br />

autological By definition Autological means selfdescribing but how do<br />

we. know that the term 'autological' is selfdescribing If 'autological' is.<br />

autological yes but do we know that I don't think we know.For<br />

'autological'. be autological it would have to be selfdescribing but how<br />

do we know if. it's selfdescribing or not Let's see if it might be<br />

heterological if. 'autological' is heterological then it's not<br />

selfdescribing and not. autological. Is it possible that 'autological' is<br />

not autological Something. selfdescribing not being selfdescribing Yes<br />

because we don't always know. when something is selfdescriptive or<br />

not. If someone points it out to me I. would know but I don't know if<br />

someone always will point it out probably not. so I can't say. This is<br />

about the gap between a word and its definition of. subsuming a token<br />

under a type. How would I know 'autological' fits under. autological<br />

Because it's selfdescribing But I don't know that it's what I'm. trying<br />

to find out by subsuming I would create the answer but not find it. I.<br />

know what selfdescribing is when I see it but I don't know if<br />

'autological'. is selfdescribing. Autological means selfdescribing but I<br />

don't know if. 'autological' is autological. What it comes down to is<br />

that it's not clear what. 'selfdescribing' is. I know it when I see it but<br />

not more than that. So I. couldn't say that 'autological' is selfdescribing<br />

even if autological means. selfdescribing. That's pretty clear after all. If<br />

someone calls himself. 'Peter' it doesn't mean it's Peter. And likewise I<br />

1285

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!