04.01.2013 Views

Springer - Read

Springer - Read

Springer - Read

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.1 ARMA(p, q) Processes 87<br />

{πj} given by (see (3.1.8))<br />

π0 1,<br />

π1 −(.4 + .5),<br />

π2 −(.4 + .5)(−.4),<br />

πj −(.4 + .5)(−.4) j−1 , j 1, 2,....<br />

(A direct derivation of these formulas for {ψj} and {πj} was given in Section 2.3<br />

without appealing to the recursions (3.1.7) and (3.1.8).)<br />

Example 3.1.2 An AR(2) process<br />

Let {Xt} be the AR(2) process<br />

Xt .7Xt−1 − .1Xt−2 + Zt, {Zt} ∼WN 0,σ 2 .<br />

The autoregressive polynomial for this process has the factorization φ(z) 1−.7z+<br />

.1z 2 (1 − .5z)(1 − .2z), and is therefore zero at z 2 and z 5. Since these<br />

zeros lie outside the unit circle, we conclude that {Xt} is a causal AR(2) process with<br />

coefficients {ψj} given by<br />

ψ0 1,<br />

ψ1 .7,<br />

ψ2 .7 2 − .1,<br />

ψj .7ψj−1 − .1ψj−2, j 2, 3,....<br />

While it is a simple matter to calculate ψj numerically for any j, it is possible also<br />

to give an explicit solution of these difference equations using the theory of linear<br />

difference equations (see TSTM, Section 3.6).<br />

The option Model>Specify of the program ITSM allows the entry of any causal<br />

ARMA(p, q) model with p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!