10.01.2013 Views

Design Report Guided Missile Submarine SSG(X) - AOE - Virginia ...

Design Report Guided Missile Submarine SSG(X) - AOE - Virginia ...

Design Report Guided Missile Submarine SSG(X) - AOE - Virginia ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>SSG</strong>(X) <strong>Design</strong> – VT Team 3 Page 11<br />

3 Concept Exploration<br />

Chapter 3 describes Concept Exploration. Trade-off studies, design space exploration and optimization are<br />

accomplished using a Multi-Objective Genetic Optimization (MOGO).<br />

3.1 Trade-Off Studies, Technologies, Concepts and <strong>Design</strong> Variables<br />

Available technologies and concepts necessary to provide required functional capabilities are identified and<br />

defined in terms of performance, cost, risk and ship impact (weight, area, volume, power). Trade-off studies are<br />

performed using technology and concept design parameters to select trade-off options in a multi-objective genetic<br />

optimization (MOGO) for the total ship design. Technology and concept trade spaces and parameters are described<br />

in the following sections.<br />

3.1.1 Hull Form Alternatives<br />

<strong>SSG</strong>(X) hull alternatives are chosen based on a set of performance metrics and other considerations. From<br />

these a list of general requirements for the submarine hull is formed and initial design variables and parameter<br />

ranges are specified. This defines the design space from which hull form alternatives are selected for consideration.<br />

The performance metrics are selected based on the mission needs of the <strong>SSG</strong>(X). Efficiency in transit dictates<br />

the selection of a hydrodynamic hull for low resistance. However, the submarine will not only transit, but must be<br />

able to operate agilely in littoral regions; therefore, dynamic stability and maneuverability are important factors in<br />

the design. To maintain structural efficiency, weight is kept to a minimum. The <strong>SSG</strong>(X) must be producible and<br />

affordable. The diameter of the submarine must be greater than 22 feet to carry the missile payload and<br />

accommodate the Vertical Launch System (VLS).<br />

A traditional teardrop shape was selected for the hull of <strong>SSG</strong>(X). The teardrop shape has an elliptical bow and<br />

parabolic stern and was chosen based on its low submerged resistance. This shape is modified by the addition of<br />

parallel midbody for arrangements and machinery and mission spaces. The traditional teardrop and modified<br />

teardrop shapes are shown in Figure 4. The pressure hull will be axis-symmetric for structural efficiency and<br />

producibility. The hydrodynamic envelope may have a slightly larger beam than depth. Two or three decks may be<br />

included in the pressure hull; these decks will have a height between 7 and 8 feet. A lower bilge for batteries and<br />

tankage with a height between 6 and 8 feet will also be included in the pressure hull. The ranges for the diameter,<br />

length, beam, and fore and aft body characteristics are shown in Table 6. The parameters ηf and ηa are exponents<br />

that describe the fullness of the fore and aft bodies as shown in Figure 4.<br />

Figure 4 - Teardrop and Modified Teardrop Hull Forms [MIT Jackson Notes]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!