Design Report Guided Missile Submarine SSG(X) - AOE - Virginia ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SSG(X) Design – VT Team 3 Page 34 previously. The OMOR is a weighted summation of each total risk for each risk type. The calculation of risk is further described in 3.4.2. • MOGO Module: The Multi-Objective Genetic Optimizer maximizes the OMOE while complying with the constraints produced by the ratios found in the Feasibility Module and minimizing the CBCC and OMOR. 3.4 Objective Attributes 3.4.1 Overall Measure of Effectiveness (OMOE) Important terminology used in describing the process to develop the SSG(X) OMOE includes: • Overall Measure of Effectiveness (OMOE) - Single overall figure of merit index (0-1.0) describing ship effectiveness in specified missions • Mission or Mission Type Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) - Figure of merit index (0-1.0) for specific mission scenarios or mission types • Measures of Performance (MOPs) - Specific ship or system performance metric in required capabilities independent of mission (speed, range, number of missiles) • Value of Performance (VOP) - Figure of merit index (0-1.0) specifying the value of a specific MOP to a specific mission area for a specific mission type There are several considerations to determine overall mission effectiveness in a naval submarine: MOPs, defense policy and goals, threat, environment, missions, mission scenarios, force structure, modeling and simulation or war gaming results and expert opinion. A master war gaming model includes all information about the problem to predict resulting measures of effectiveness for a matrix of submarine performance inputs in a series of probabilistic scenarios. The application of regression analysis to the results defines a mathematical relationship between input submarine MOPs and output effectiveness. The accuracy of such a simulation depends on modeling the detailed interactions of the complex human and physical system and its response to a broad range of quantitative and qualitative variables and conditions including submarine MOPs. Each set of discrete input variables requires a statistically significant number of full simulations since the majority of the inputs and responses are probabilistic. This extensive modeling capability is not yet available for practical applications. An alternative to modeling and simulation is to use expert opinion to incorporate these diverse inputs and assess the value or utility of submarine MOPs in an OMOE function. This is usually structured as a multi-attribute decision problem. Two methods for structuring these problems are Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). In the past, supporters of these theories have been critical of each other, but recently efforts to identify similarities and blend the best of both for application in Multi-Attribute Value (MAV) functions. This approach is adapted here for deriving an OMOE. The process begins with the Mission Need Statement (Appendix A) and mission description (Chapter 2). Required Operational Capabilities (ROCs) identified to perform the ship’s mission(s) and measures of performance (MOPs) specify those capabilities that will vary in the designs as a function of the submarine Design Variables (DVs). Each MOP is assigned a threshold and goal value. ROCs and applicable restraints to all designs are specified in Table 24. Table 24 summarizes the ROCs, DVs, and MOPs as defined for SSG(X). Goal and threshold values are assigned to MOPs critical to submarine mission in Table 25. An OMOE hierarchy is then developed (Figure 28). Next, AHP and pair-wise comparison calculate MOP weights. Multi-Attribute Value Theory (MAVT) develops individual MOP value functions. The result is a weighted overall effectiveness function (OMOE) used as an objective in the multi-objective optimization. Expert and customer opinion are required to calculate AHP weights using pair-wise comparison questionnaires. MOP and VOP values calculate VOP functions, usually S-curves, for use in the ship synthesis model. A particular VOP with a value of 0 corresponds to the MOP threshold, while a value of 1.0 corresponds to the MOP goal. Figure 28 is the OMOE hierarchy for SSG(X) derived from Table 25 Two missions (ISR and Missile Launch) depend on the same four MOP categories (War Fighting, Mobility, Sustainability, and Susceptibility). Each of four categories has associated MOPs.
SSG(X) Design – VT Team 3 Page 35 Table 24 - ROC/MOP/DV Summary ROCs Description Applicable Systems and Technology MOP Related DV Goal Threshold VLS; Sea Sentry; BPS- AAW SAIL SAIL=1 SAIL=4 AAW 1.2 Support area anti-air defense 16 Radar; BPS-15 Radar; BSY-1; BSY-2; SUBTICS C4I/SPW VLS SONARSYS VLS=1 SONARSYS=1 VLS=3 SONARSYS=4 VLS; Sea Sentry; BPS- AAW SAIL SAIL=1 SAIL=4 Provide anti-air defense 16 Radar; BPS-15 C4I/SPW VLS VLS=1 VLS=3 AAW 2 in cooperation with Radar; BSY-1; BSY-2; SONARSYS SONARSYS=1 SONARSYS=4 other forces SUBTICS; AN/BRAi- 34 AAW 9 Engage airborne threats using surface-to-air armament VLS; Sea Sentry; BPS- 16 Radar; BPS-15 Radar; BSY-1; BSY-2; SUBTICS AAW C4I/SPW SAIL VLS SONARSYS SAIL=1 VLS=1 SONARSYS=1 SAIL=4 VLS=3 SONARSYS=4 AMW 6 Conduct airborne autonomous vehicle (AAV) operations Sea Sentry; BPS-16 Radar; BPS-15 Radar; BSY-1; BSY-2; SUBTICS AAW C4I/SPW SAIL SONARSYS SAIL=1 SONARSYS=1 SAIL=3 SONARSYS=4 Full 6 or 4 21” tubes; ASuW TORP TORP=1 TORP=9 Sea Sentry; BPS-16 SONARSYS SONARSYS=1 SONARSYS=4 ASU 1 Engage surface threats with anti-surface armaments Radar; BPS-15 Radar; BQQ-10 Sonar; BQQ-5 Sonar; BQQ-6 Sonar; Thales Suite Sonar; BSY-1; BSY-2; SUBTICS SAIL VLS SAIL=1 VLS =1 SAIL=4 VLS =3 Full 6 or 4 21” tubes; ASuW TORP TORP=1 TORP=9 Sea Sentry; BPS-16 SONARSYS SONARSYS=1 SONARSYS=4 Radar; BPS-15 Radar; SAIL SAIL=1 SAIL=4 ASU 1.1 Engage surface ships at long range BQQ-10 Sonar; BQQ-5 Sonar; BQQ-6 Sonar; Thales Suite Sonar; BSY-1; BSY-2; SUBTICS VLS VLS =1 VLS =3 Full 6 or 4 21” tubes; ASuW TORP TORP=1 TORP=9 Sea Sentry; BPS-16 SONARSYS SONARSYS=1 SONARSYS=4 Radar; BPS-15 Radar; SAIL SAIL=1 SAIL=4 ASU 1.2 Engage surface ships at medium range BQQ-10 Sonar; BQQ-5 Sonar; BQQ-6 Sonar; Thales Suite Sonar; BSY-1; BSY-2; SUBTICS VLS VLS =1 VLS =3 Full 6 or 4 21” tubes; ASuW TORP TORP=1 TORP=9 Sea Sentry; BPS-16 C4I/SPW SONARSYS SONARSYS=1 SONARSYS=4 ASU 2 Engage surface ships in cooperation with other forces Radar; BPS-15 Radar; BQQ-10 Sonar; BQQ-5 Sonar; BQQ-6 Sonar; Thales Suite Sonar; BSY-1; BSY-2; SUBTICS SAIL VLS SAIL=1 VLS =1 SAIL=4 VLS =3 Full 6 or 4 21” tubes; ASuW TORP TORP=1 TORP=9 Detect and track a Sea Sentry; BPS-16 SONARSYS SONARSYS=1 SONARSYS=4 ASU 4.2 surface target using Radar; BPS-15 Radar; SAIL SAIL=1 SAIL=4 sonar BQQ-10 Sonar; BQQ-5 Sonar; BQQ-6 Sonar; VLS VLS =1 VLS =3
Page 1 and 2: Design Report Guided Missile Submar
Page 3 and 4: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 3 Ta
Page 5 and 6: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 5 1
Page 7 and 8: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 7 1.
Page 9 and 10: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 9 en
Page 13 and 14: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 13 S
Page 15 and 16: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 15 F
Page 17 and 18: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 17 T
Page 23 and 24: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 23 V
Page 33: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 33 g
Page 37 and 38: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 37 R
Page 39 and 40: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 39 R
Page 41 and 42: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 41 I
Page 45 and 46: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 45 i
Page 47 and 48: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 47 A
Page 49 and 50: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 49 D
Page 57 and 58: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 57 C
Page 61 and 62: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 61 W
Page 77 and 78: SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 77 g
Page 85 and 86:
SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 85 F
Page 87 and 88:
SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 87 4
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 97
Page 99 and 100:
SSG(X) Design - VT Team 3 Page 99 A
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
show all

Design Report Guided Missile Submarine SSG(X) - AOE - Virginia ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?