Design Report Guided Missile Submarine SSG(X) - AOE - Virginia ...
Design Report Guided Missile Submarine SSG(X) - AOE - Virginia ...
Design Report Guided Missile Submarine SSG(X) - AOE - Virginia ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>SSG</strong>(X) <strong>Design</strong> – VT Team 3 Page 66<br />
spacing of one to two diameters. Based on this rule, an additional king frame divides the distance between the two<br />
bulkheads.<br />
Constraints provided by the arrangements fix the bulkhead and king frame locations. An aft section (38 ft.<br />
in length – Module 1) with external framing contains the machinery room; a watertight bulkhead separates this<br />
section from the next. Forward of this bulkhead are two sections (52 ft. and 30 ft. in length – Module 2 and 3,<br />
respectively) with internal framing which are separated by a king frame; a watertight bulkhead separates the third<br />
section from the forward most section. The forward most section (30 ft. in length – Module 4) with external framing<br />
contains the torpedo room. Figure 57 shows the modular divisions and frame locations.<br />
A rule for ring frame spacing suggests one tenth to one fifth of the diameter between ring frames. One<br />
tenth of the diameter is 32.4 inches. Initial optimization runs indicated that this is an optimum frame spacing. In<br />
order to achieve equal frame spacing along the length of the module, the frame spacing was calculated and fixed for<br />
the MathCAD calculations and within MAESTRO.<br />
HY-80 steel, which is the most common steel used in the construction of US Navy submarines, is used for<br />
the pressure hull shell plating and all framing. The framing consists of standard T-shapes.<br />
4.4.2 Loads and Failure Modes<br />
The primary load on the pressure hull is the pressure at maximum operating depth. The MathCAD calculations<br />
use the nominal pressure in order to consider the following failure modes: shell yielding (SY), lobar buckling (LB),<br />
general instability (GI), frame yielding (fy), and frame instability (FI).<br />
MAESTRO assumes pressure is applied to plating on the side opposite of any frames attached to the plating. In<br />
order to correctly simulate pressure on the plating, artificial strakes with internal frames (with negligible scantlings)<br />
are placed at the same nodes as the actual strakes. Pressure is applied to the artificial strakes. As the nodes<br />
connected to the artificial strakes move in response to the pressure, the stress is transferred to the actual strakes via<br />
the displacement of the nodes. The axial compression caused by the pressure at the ends is simulated by placing<br />
equivalent point forces at the nodes on each end. MAESTRO considers the following failure modes: panel collapse<br />
membrane yield (PCMY), cylindrical local buckling (CCLocB), and cylindrical general buckling (CCGenB).<br />
4.4.3 Safety Factors, Optimization Results, and Adequacy<br />
The following safety factors are used in determining adequacy in the MathCAD calculations: shell yielding<br />
(1.5), lobar buckling (2.25), general instability (3.75), frame yielding (1.5), and frame instability (1.8). Optimization<br />
is performed over continuous values; a final optimization with producible values is used to determine final adequacy<br />
values. Figure 56 shows the value of the weighted average buoyancy factor during the optimization; eliminating<br />
infeasible designs yielded Run #7 as the most efficient set of scantlings. Table 42 lists final adequacy parameters<br />
(normalized around one) by module and mode before and after conversion to standard size scantlings. Table 43 lists<br />
final frame scantlings.<br />
Figure 56 - MathCAD Optimization Results