10.01.2013 Views

Design Report Guided Missile Submarine SSG(X) - AOE - Virginia ...

Design Report Guided Missile Submarine SSG(X) - AOE - Virginia ...

Design Report Guided Missile Submarine SSG(X) - AOE - Virginia ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>SSG</strong>(X) <strong>Design</strong> – VT Team 3 Page 66<br />

spacing of one to two diameters. Based on this rule, an additional king frame divides the distance between the two<br />

bulkheads.<br />

Constraints provided by the arrangements fix the bulkhead and king frame locations. An aft section (38 ft.<br />

in length – Module 1) with external framing contains the machinery room; a watertight bulkhead separates this<br />

section from the next. Forward of this bulkhead are two sections (52 ft. and 30 ft. in length – Module 2 and 3,<br />

respectively) with internal framing which are separated by a king frame; a watertight bulkhead separates the third<br />

section from the forward most section. The forward most section (30 ft. in length – Module 4) with external framing<br />

contains the torpedo room. Figure 57 shows the modular divisions and frame locations.<br />

A rule for ring frame spacing suggests one tenth to one fifth of the diameter between ring frames. One<br />

tenth of the diameter is 32.4 inches. Initial optimization runs indicated that this is an optimum frame spacing. In<br />

order to achieve equal frame spacing along the length of the module, the frame spacing was calculated and fixed for<br />

the MathCAD calculations and within MAESTRO.<br />

HY-80 steel, which is the most common steel used in the construction of US Navy submarines, is used for<br />

the pressure hull shell plating and all framing. The framing consists of standard T-shapes.<br />

4.4.2 Loads and Failure Modes<br />

The primary load on the pressure hull is the pressure at maximum operating depth. The MathCAD calculations<br />

use the nominal pressure in order to consider the following failure modes: shell yielding (SY), lobar buckling (LB),<br />

general instability (GI), frame yielding (fy), and frame instability (FI).<br />

MAESTRO assumes pressure is applied to plating on the side opposite of any frames attached to the plating. In<br />

order to correctly simulate pressure on the plating, artificial strakes with internal frames (with negligible scantlings)<br />

are placed at the same nodes as the actual strakes. Pressure is applied to the artificial strakes. As the nodes<br />

connected to the artificial strakes move in response to the pressure, the stress is transferred to the actual strakes via<br />

the displacement of the nodes. The axial compression caused by the pressure at the ends is simulated by placing<br />

equivalent point forces at the nodes on each end. MAESTRO considers the following failure modes: panel collapse<br />

membrane yield (PCMY), cylindrical local buckling (CCLocB), and cylindrical general buckling (CCGenB).<br />

4.4.3 Safety Factors, Optimization Results, and Adequacy<br />

The following safety factors are used in determining adequacy in the MathCAD calculations: shell yielding<br />

(1.5), lobar buckling (2.25), general instability (3.75), frame yielding (1.5), and frame instability (1.8). Optimization<br />

is performed over continuous values; a final optimization with producible values is used to determine final adequacy<br />

values. Figure 56 shows the value of the weighted average buoyancy factor during the optimization; eliminating<br />

infeasible designs yielded Run #7 as the most efficient set of scantlings. Table 42 lists final adequacy parameters<br />

(normalized around one) by module and mode before and after conversion to standard size scantlings. Table 43 lists<br />

final frame scantlings.<br />

Figure 56 - MathCAD Optimization Results

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!