18.01.2013 Views

iieiiei1eWrkers - Leicester Research Archive - University of Leicester

iieiiei1eWrkers - Leicester Research Archive - University of Leicester

iieiiei1eWrkers - Leicester Research Archive - University of Leicester

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

political power is now on the decline. Although the standard censorship<br />

measures are obligingly adhered to by the media practitioners in Radio Thailand,<br />

they do not apply as strictly to those outside the <strong>of</strong>ficial institution, particularly<br />

by the press. In this context, the spaces available for political and social<br />

debate need to be seen across the range <strong>of</strong> the mass media as well as within<br />

the state media. On radio, the emergence <strong>of</strong> the popular news commentary<br />

programmes and political drama illustrate the limits <strong>of</strong> state control in closing<br />

the space for argument.<br />

Our analysis <strong>of</strong> the serious genres revolves around the themes relating to debate<br />

on social transition which are the focus <strong>of</strong> the present ideological struggles<br />

within the dominant power bloc. For instance, how does each institution<br />

propose to achieve their social utopia? Are they presenting the same imagery?<br />

How is the notion <strong>of</strong> modernisation or progress defined and interpreted in<br />

different programmes? And lastly, how is the consensus on a constitutional<br />

monarchy presented? In contrast, we also look at how these discourses are<br />

translated into fictional representation in an analysis <strong>of</strong> political drama in the<br />

final section.<br />

7.1 The Sunday Sermon and Buddhist Moral Ethics<br />

"We all have to contribute urgently in order to counter i/ic threats and<br />

dangers that our nation, our religion and our beloved and revered<br />

king, is facing. If we do not do anything, we wi/I be doomed.<br />

But if we see i/ia danger, we must gel up and slap forward, ready /0<br />

engage in battle. We are not fighting a conveniional war, we are<br />

fighting an ideological war.<br />

('I-low can monks and I3udd/iists lie/p to<br />

develop the nation?', 30th April, 1986)<br />

Despite the schism in the Thai Sangha over the degree <strong>of</strong> institutional<br />

independence from the state, as the above quotation by Panyananta Bhikkhu,<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the prominent advocate <strong>of</strong> Buddhadasa . Bhikkhu indicates, all factions<br />

recognise an urgent need to preserve Buddhist moral ethics as well as to<br />

accommodate to certain reforms.<br />

In the Sunday sermon programme the state provides the space for both the<br />

established Sangha and the once banned non-conformist, Buddhadasa Bhikkhu,<br />

and his disciples. While the perspective <strong>of</strong> the former closely corresponds with<br />

On the role <strong>of</strong> the monks and the modernisation scheme, see for<br />

example Suksamran, S. (1977), Political Buddhism in Southeast Asia: The<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> the Sangha in the Modernisalion <strong>of</strong> Thailand, and Mulder, N.<br />

(1973), Buddhism and National Development in Thailand.<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!