18.01.2013 Views

iieiiei1eWrkers - Leicester Research Archive - University of Leicester

iieiiei1eWrkers - Leicester Research Archive - University of Leicester

iieiiei1eWrkers - Leicester Research Archive - University of Leicester

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In the present era <strong>of</strong> resurgent capital, the disposessed peasants in the<br />

countryside and workers in the urban areas continue to be exploited. The<br />

recent contraction in the agriculture sector in which 67% <strong>of</strong> the working<br />

population earn their living was hit particularly hard. Since priority is placed<br />

on the industrial sector, there are few protective measures for the wage earning<br />

and small holding peasants. On the contrary, the 'Summer Employment<br />

Scheme' and the modified modernisation scheme, the so called 'Rural Poverty<br />

Programme', have been extracting free labour from the peasants in a similar<br />

way to the Sakdina period, while allowing large agribusinesses to penetrate<br />

deeper into this sector. In addition, rice exports have been severely daniaged<br />

beginning in the 1985/1986 season, when the US government passed its Farm<br />

Bill as part <strong>of</strong> its protectionist policy.<br />

Neither the import substitution policy <strong>of</strong> the 1960s and early l970s, nor the<br />

export policy that followed, was able to resolve the fundamental problem <strong>of</strong><br />

dependence on foreign investment and international trade. Peasants are caught<br />

between a transformed agricultural sector which closes <strong>of</strong>f alternative employment<br />

and an industrial sector which cannot guarantee them their livelihood. The<br />

unstable economic situation in recent years has generated fluctuations in<br />

industrial disputes, but explosive confrontations have been successfully contained,<br />

as the <strong>of</strong>ficial record demonstrates (Bank <strong>of</strong> Thailand, 1983,1985);<br />

year No. disputes No. strikes Working days<br />

(workers) (workers) lost<br />

1985 220 4 13,078<br />

(49,073) (645)<br />

1984 86 17 n/a<br />

(32,752) (6,742)<br />

1983 246 29 60,538<br />

(112,193) (10,957)<br />

However, reports from the Civil Liberty Union and the Asian Workers Solidarity<br />

Links-Thailand, reveal serious breaches <strong>of</strong> the Labour Relations Law by<br />

employers. These include; closing down plants in order to hire a whole new<br />

workforce; sacking unionists; and not implementing minimum wage agreements.<br />

Although there are 444 unions and four labour congresses, at the present time<br />

union members account for only 1% <strong>of</strong> the 2.5 million strong workforce. The<br />

main concerns <strong>of</strong> the unions are economic, achieving a better standard <strong>of</strong> living<br />

for their members. Political issues are left to a small minority <strong>of</strong> union activists<br />

(Petphrasert, 1986). However, several rallies were organised in conjunction with<br />

the students, to protest against US protectionism in textiles - the Jenkin Bill -<br />

and agricultural produce - the Farm Bill in 1985 and 1986.<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!