18.01.2013 Views

iieiiei1eWrkers - Leicester Research Archive - University of Leicester

iieiiei1eWrkers - Leicester Research Archive - University of Leicester

iieiiei1eWrkers - Leicester Research Archive - University of Leicester

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.2 The Production <strong>of</strong> News and Current Affairs Programmes: Organisation<br />

and Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Ideology<br />

Broadcast journalism emerged during the acceleration <strong>of</strong> commercialism in the<br />

media industries in the 1960s, but the development <strong>of</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>essional ideology is<br />

a more recent phenomenon. As Golding and Elliot (1979:17-18) have pointed<br />

out, the strategy <strong>of</strong> audience seeking in the commercial press provides a fit<br />

between organisational goal and pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism as an ideology. Broadcasting<br />

however, suffers from the state-defined notion <strong>of</strong> news which prohibits the airing<br />

<strong>of</strong> opinion, extreme dissent or excessive controversy. In common with many<br />

Third World countries, broadcasting in Thailand is under stringent legislative<br />

restraints, as outlined earlier in 4. 1 . So how has pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism in<br />

broadcasting developed within these complex relations between political constraints<br />

and economic imperatives? To answer this question we look firstly at how<br />

broadcast journalism evolved in relation to news making in the press and the<br />

state-run media. We then examine the production <strong>of</strong> two 'popular neWS<br />

conunenlary' programmes, Kao Si Mum Baan on Tor Or radio and Kao Dunn<br />

Juan Saang on Wor Bhor Tor radio, in an attempt to show how pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism<br />

as an ideology must necessarily challenge the state-defined notion <strong>of</strong> impartiality<br />

in order to fulfill the broadcasting organisations' economic goals.<br />

Broadcast journalism, the state and the conunercial press<br />

For the first three decades <strong>of</strong> radio's development, the Department <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Relations monopolised broadcast news production. The political goals <strong>of</strong> the new<br />

constitutional government coupled with a paternalistic view deeply rooted in the<br />

bourgeois state provided the bedrock for an 'impartial' use <strong>of</strong> broadcasting.<br />

But as we shall see, this notion <strong>of</strong> impartiality which equates it with an<br />

uncritical view <strong>of</strong> the state, becomes problematic within the dual system <strong>of</strong><br />

broadcasting.<br />

News production in the state-run sector <strong>of</strong> radio is divided into two separate<br />

operations, processing and presenting. In the Department <strong>of</strong> Public Relations,<br />

news processing is located in the Domestic and Foreign News Divisions. News<br />

presentation is allocated o Radio Thailand. In its early years, the passive<br />

processing <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial annou ncemeiits and news releases required little jou inal istic<br />

skill from the practitioners/civil servants. In contrast, Radio Thailand's news<br />

announcers are now at the forefront <strong>of</strong> presentation. They aie selected for<br />

their language capability and their convincing tone <strong>of</strong> 'voice' (Huncliaroen,<br />

1983).<br />

S<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!