22.01.2013 Views

DS 2-8 Earthquake Protection for Water-Based Fire ... - FM Global

DS 2-8 Earthquake Protection for Water-Based Fire ... - FM Global

DS 2-8 Earthquake Protection for Water-Based Fire ... - FM Global

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Protection</strong> 2-8<br />

<strong>FM</strong> <strong>Global</strong> Property Loss Prevention Data Sheets Page 3<br />

1.0 SCOPE<br />

This data sheet provides recommendations <strong>for</strong> earthquake protection of fixed water-based fire protection<br />

systems. Apply these recommendations to locations in <strong>FM</strong> <strong>Global</strong> 50-year through 500-year earthquake<br />

zones, as described in Data Sheet 1-2, <strong>Earthquake</strong>s.<br />

Loads and capacities in this data sheet are based on the Allowable Stress Design analysis method.<br />

1.1 Changes<br />

May 2010. This data sheet has been revised in its entirety to provide a consistent <strong>for</strong>mat. Editorial corrections<br />

(such as revising metric sizes) were made throughout the document. Several technical revisions were made<br />

as well, the most significant of which include the following:<br />

• Clarified that design basis is Allowable Stress Design (Section 1.0).<br />

• Changed the design coefficient “G” <strong>for</strong> <strong>FM</strong> <strong>Global</strong> 50-year, 250-year, and 500-year zones (Section<br />

2.2.1.2.2).<br />

• Modified in<strong>for</strong>mation on attachments to concrete in Section 2.2.1.3.6.<br />

• Added flexibility guidelines <strong>for</strong> unanchored suction tanks (Section 2.2.6.1.4).<br />

• Added Section 2.3 regarding the use of other codes and standards.<br />

• Added references to Section 4.0.<br />

• Added glossary terms to Appendix A.<br />

• Relocated commentary to Appendix C.<br />

• Updated Figs. 2-6, 8, 10, 12, 14-16, and 18-29.<br />

• Revised brace capacities (Tables 2-7), wood through-bolt and lag-screw capacities (Tables 9-12), and<br />

concrete anchor capacities (Tables 13 and 14).<br />

• Made minor revisions to Tables 1, 8, and 15-19.<br />

2.0 LOSS PREVENTION RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

2.1 Introduction<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong>-related strains are imparted to a fire protection system through the building or the ground to<br />

which it is attached, or through inertial movement within the system itself. Uncontrolled differential movement<br />

can cause damage when fire protection systems are not provided in a systematic manner with the necessary<br />

features that incorporate sway bracing, flexibility, clearance, and anchorage where needed. Because an<br />

uncontrolled fire after an earthquake can result in a devastating loss, the primary concern related to<br />

deficiencies in earthquake protection is that the fire protection systems will be impaired as a result of strong<br />

ground shaking. In terms of frequency, however, the most common type of damage, based on past<br />

experience, is due to water leakage from broken overhead sprinkler piping or sprinklers, primarily due to lack<br />

of sway bracing where needed.<br />

Common sources of water damage are broken or separated overhead sprinkler piping, broken sprinklers<br />

due to impact with nearby structural members or other equipment, broken sprinklers or pipe drops due to<br />

excessive differential movement between unbraced suspended ceilings and the pipe drops, and broken<br />

in-rack sprinkler system piping or sprinklers due to excessive rack movement. In addition to damage from<br />

water leakage, fire protection systems are often impaired due to direct damage to the systems, or due to<br />

damage to public water supplies or utilities needed <strong>for</strong> fire protection. Significant impairments to fire protection<br />

systems may expose a facility to a severe fire loss following an earthquake.<br />

In evaluating the many incidents of damage, two conclusions are very apparent:<br />

1. Only by providing, in a systematic manner, the necessary features (which incorporate sway<br />

bracing, flexibility, clearance, and anchorage where needed) can a fire protection system be<br />

adequately protected from earthquake damage.<br />

©2010 Factory Mutual Insurance Company. All rights reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!