Forest Road Engineering Guidebook - Ministry of Forests
Forest Road Engineering Guidebook - Ministry of Forests
Forest Road Engineering Guidebook - Ministry of Forests
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Road</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Guidebook</strong><br />
22<br />
Refer to the <strong>Ministry</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>s package <strong>of</strong> road layout and design forms that<br />
incorporate the above statutory content requirements. This information can<br />
be found at an appropriate <strong>Ministry</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>s website.<br />
Additional guidelines for preparing and implementing measures to maintain<br />
slope stability are available in several <strong>Forest</strong> Regions.<br />
Criteria for measures to maintain slope stability<br />
If a proposed road will cross areas with a moderate or high likelihood <strong>of</strong><br />
landslides as determined by a TSFA, the person required to prepare a road<br />
layout and design must ensure that it includes measures to maintain slope<br />
stability that satisfy either Criterion 1 (hazard-based) OR Criterion 2<br />
(risk-based). These criteria are explained below, and are consistent with the<br />
requirements <strong>of</strong> Section 6 (1)(n)(i) and (ii) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Road</strong> Regulation.<br />
Criterion 1<br />
Code Requirement: In this criterion, the selected measure is the least<br />
likely measure to result in a landslide, and a<br />
qualified registered pr<strong>of</strong>essional provides a statement<br />
to this effect. (See Section 6 (1)(n)(i) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Forest</strong><br />
<strong>Road</strong> Regulation.)<br />
Criterion 1 is considered to be hazard-based (hazard being the likelihood <strong>of</strong><br />
landslide occurrence). It requires consideration <strong>of</strong> a limited number <strong>of</strong> road<br />
construction techniques that are likely to result in the lowest likelihood <strong>of</strong><br />
landslide occurrence. Meeting this criterion would be justified in areas where<br />
the likelihood <strong>of</strong> landslide occurrence is high, and where any measure other<br />
than the “least likely measure to result in a landslide” would be unacceptable<br />
to a district manager.<br />
A measure that would satisfy the above criterion is any prescription or recommendation<br />
for a road construction technique that will result in at least a<br />
low likelihood <strong>of</strong> a landslide occurring. A qualified registered pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
must provide a statement to this effect to accompany the prescriptions or recommendations.<br />
No other road construction techniques other than the ones<br />
that provide for at least a low likelihood <strong>of</strong> landslide occurrence should be<br />
considered. There are usually only a few methods <strong>of</strong> road construction that<br />
fit this criterion, and most involve higher road costs. Obviously, the selected<br />
measure should be considered in the context <strong>of</strong> conventional practices for<br />
forest roads.<br />
Examples <strong>of</strong> least likely measures to result in a landslide include any road<br />
construction technique that has a low or very low likelihood <strong>of</strong> landslide<br />
occurrence, such as: