31.01.2013 Views

Forest Road Engineering Guidebook - Ministry of Forests

Forest Road Engineering Guidebook - Ministry of Forests

Forest Road Engineering Guidebook - Ministry of Forests

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Road</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Guidebook</strong><br />

22<br />

Refer to the <strong>Ministry</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>s package <strong>of</strong> road layout and design forms that<br />

incorporate the above statutory content requirements. This information can<br />

be found at an appropriate <strong>Ministry</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>s website.<br />

Additional guidelines for preparing and implementing measures to maintain<br />

slope stability are available in several <strong>Forest</strong> Regions.<br />

Criteria for measures to maintain slope stability<br />

If a proposed road will cross areas with a moderate or high likelihood <strong>of</strong><br />

landslides as determined by a TSFA, the person required to prepare a road<br />

layout and design must ensure that it includes measures to maintain slope<br />

stability that satisfy either Criterion 1 (hazard-based) OR Criterion 2<br />

(risk-based). These criteria are explained below, and are consistent with the<br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> Section 6 (1)(n)(i) and (ii) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Road</strong> Regulation.<br />

Criterion 1<br />

Code Requirement: In this criterion, the selected measure is the least<br />

likely measure to result in a landslide, and a<br />

qualified registered pr<strong>of</strong>essional provides a statement<br />

to this effect. (See Section 6 (1)(n)(i) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Forest</strong><br />

<strong>Road</strong> Regulation.)<br />

Criterion 1 is considered to be hazard-based (hazard being the likelihood <strong>of</strong><br />

landslide occurrence). It requires consideration <strong>of</strong> a limited number <strong>of</strong> road<br />

construction techniques that are likely to result in the lowest likelihood <strong>of</strong><br />

landslide occurrence. Meeting this criterion would be justified in areas where<br />

the likelihood <strong>of</strong> landslide occurrence is high, and where any measure other<br />

than the “least likely measure to result in a landslide” would be unacceptable<br />

to a district manager.<br />

A measure that would satisfy the above criterion is any prescription or recommendation<br />

for a road construction technique that will result in at least a<br />

low likelihood <strong>of</strong> a landslide occurring. A qualified registered pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

must provide a statement to this effect to accompany the prescriptions or recommendations.<br />

No other road construction techniques other than the ones<br />

that provide for at least a low likelihood <strong>of</strong> landslide occurrence should be<br />

considered. There are usually only a few methods <strong>of</strong> road construction that<br />

fit this criterion, and most involve higher road costs. Obviously, the selected<br />

measure should be considered in the context <strong>of</strong> conventional practices for<br />

forest roads.<br />

Examples <strong>of</strong> least likely measures to result in a landslide include any road<br />

construction technique that has a low or very low likelihood <strong>of</strong> landslide<br />

occurrence, such as:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!