31.01.2013 Views

PhD Thesis - Cranfield University

PhD Thesis - Cranfield University

PhD Thesis - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5<br />

In this strategy, only P battmax is varied throughout the decision epochs with all other outputs<br />

held at constant values determined by design. The influence of the EMS over a standard<br />

US06 schedule is illustrated in Figure 5.16 and Figure 5.17. With both simulations, the<br />

starting SoC of the ultracapacitors are equal and set just below the maximum value. In<br />

Figure 5.16, the EMS is not activated and so the power split between the battery and<br />

ultracapacitor is determined by the fixed policy constraints of the PMS. Ultracapacitor<br />

power is only required when the load demand exceeds the defined battery capability and no<br />

intervention of its target SoC is performed. As shown in the second graph of Figure 5.16,<br />

during the second deceleration to zero speed event the ultracapacitor is charged via<br />

regenerative braking but only to its maximum SoC. For illustration purpose, the SoC graph<br />

of Figure 5.16 shows the rise of SoC above the maximum value as the extra capacity<br />

required to harness the regenerative energy. In this scenario, the activation of dissipative<br />

(dynamic) brakes is required. This is shown in the bottom graph of Figure 5.16.<br />

Disipative Brake Activation<br />

(Boolean)<br />

(km/h)<br />

(pu)<br />

1<br />

Figure 5.16 Simulation of ultracapacitor SoC without the EMS.<br />

152<br />

SoC<br />

Max<br />

(Activation of dissipative brakes is necessary to absorb access regenerative power)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!