31.01.2013 Views

PhD Thesis - Cranfield University

PhD Thesis - Cranfield University

PhD Thesis - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 8<br />

From the results of the experiment, practical reference parameters can be extracted as the<br />

PMS battery operating constraints. Figure 8.8 presents the measured current and voltage<br />

waveforms for Segment 1 as projections of the desired voltage boundaries to the<br />

corresponding current levels. In the voltage plot, the lower battery voltage is first defined to<br />

be approximately 45V. The point x1 marks an instance where the battery voltage crosses<br />

beyond this lower limit. The projection of x1 on the time scale to the battery current<br />

waveform gives the corresponding current value, which is marked by intersection point x2.<br />

From the current plot, the maximum battery current is found to be 150A, thus specifying<br />

that the battery power limit (V x I) is to be set at a value of 6.75kW. Similarly, the upper<br />

voltage boundary specifies the charging power (or regenerative power) limits. The<br />

intersection values and projections using marking points x3 and x4 gives a maximum<br />

charging current of 25A . As was discussed previously, charging the battery this way is not<br />

efficient and ideally the minimum battery power should be zero with all regenerative braking<br />

power handled by the ultracapacitor instead.<br />

Battery Voltage (V)<br />

Battery Current (A)<br />

Desired Battery<br />

working voltage boundary<br />

Defined Battery<br />

working current boundary<br />

x2<br />

x1<br />

x3<br />

x4<br />

217<br />

Time (s)<br />

Time (s)<br />

Figure 8.8 Determining battery operating limits empirically

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!