02.02.2013 Views

virsight hearing - Motor Vehicle Hazard Archive Project

virsight hearing - Motor Vehicle Hazard Archive Project

virsight hearing - Motor Vehicle Hazard Archive Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Until ftHTSA puts a st.ndard ln Dlace, of cou.se, ADericans rlll hav! to rcly<br />

rolely on tho good f.ith of the cdr cdnpanies for.dequrt€ r€dr-5Pat rP!tr.lnt<br />

protpction in crishes. lf the conpanies declde to discontinue pl.n5 for puttlng<br />

re.r-s€.t lap-rhoulder belts jn ney cars tornor.ov tDrning, thev iill be entirely<br />

t.ee to do 5o -- just as Gen€ral fiotors.nd Fard discontjnued thPir proni9€d i1r<br />

bao oronrihs in rhe 1970's becausp NHTSA h.d nor. put .<br />

"oassr!o<br />

restrrlnt'<br />

st.nd.rd ln place.<br />

Thus th€ i.dustr), not the regulato.y .gency, has €ffectively talca conlrol of<br />

providing or den)in9 idequate c.ash Drotection to rerr-saat occupants. Thls<br />

defies th€ lntert of !he ildtional Trafflc.nd flotor Y€hitlt Safety Act of 1966<br />

srncp in €ftect it t.urhs thc requlatary relns over to the nanufactur?r.<br />

The orly recourle available to people injured in cra5hes due to haa.rdous<br />

rear-seat la9-only b€lts is cofinon-lar.ction .q.inst th€ derellct fiafiofdcture.<br />

8ut, heie too, the manufacturers have n.d€ l€9al |nanuevers to thn6rt these clains<br />

on the basis that their anlv obligation is to meet thP ninimun st.ndard s€t by<br />

IHTSA -- in thls instanc€, th€ re;r-se.t ]!p-belt-only li;n-d;d. rhis lgnores<br />

the Act.'s cryst.l-clear injunction thrt c(mpli.nce yiith a mininum stand.rd does<br />

not protect a nanufacturer from co''rnon-lit actiDn rhen the nanufactu.er could<br />

have prevented or lessened the 5everitv of a crash injury by providing a better<br />

allernative safety 5ystein. In fact, a central Purpose of the Act and the<br />

st.ndards is to encouraq. m.nufactur€rs to Pxcepd the minimums rith improYed<br />

technologies nhenever po!sible. (see Attachment 'F" for a full discussion 6f<br />

this issue.)<br />

There is no €rcus€ for l(ttTSA's continued failure to 9et a Federal ltotor Y?hlc'1.<br />

Safety St.nderd requiring th.t at a nlninun. re.t_s€it outboard occupint5 of<br />

future new cais be given tap-lho0lder belt systeils to protect them in cri3hcs.<br />

Anything less nakes; nockery of the Actts intentions and llHTsA's ftission<br />

The IiHTSA<br />

should issup requlations regdrdinq thP nanu{scture.nd s.le o{ retrcfit<br />

3 Point re.r seat belt syslens, and_the iistallatron of factorY_built, 3 Polnt<br />

belt systefls in all neH vehiclee.<br />

-3-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!