07.02.2013 Views

Optimization and Computational Fluid Dynamics - Department of ...

Optimization and Computational Fluid Dynamics - Department of ...

Optimization and Computational Fluid Dynamics - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 Adjoint Methods for Shape <strong>Optimization</strong> 89<br />

An = Aknk <strong>and</strong> nk are the outward normal to the boundary, unit vector<br />

components. It is important to note that Eq. (4.18) includes a field integral<br />

<strong>of</strong> grid metric sensitivities δ<br />

δbi<br />

� ∂ξ m<br />

∂xk<br />

�<br />

, the computation <strong>of</strong> which increases<br />

the CPU cost <strong>and</strong> becomes a source <strong>of</strong> inaccuracies. The st<strong>and</strong>ard way to<br />

compute grid metric sensitivities is through finite differences (after perturbating<br />

one design variable at a time, modifying the contour <strong>and</strong> remeshing).<br />

If Eq. (4.16a) or<br />

δFaug<br />

δbi<br />

= δF<br />

�<br />

T ∂<br />

+ Ψ<br />

δbi Ω ∂xk<br />

� ∂fk<br />

∂bi<br />

�<br />

dΩ (4.22)<br />

is used instead, the adjoint equations <strong>and</strong> boundary conditions remain exactly<br />

the same (Eqs. (4.19), (4.20) <strong>and</strong> (4.21)) but the gradient expression becomes<br />

δF<br />

δbi<br />

= 1<br />

�<br />

�<br />

2 δ(dS) ∂U<br />

(p − ptar) −<br />

2 Sw δbi Sw ∂xk<br />

�<br />

+ (Ψk+1p − Ψ T f k) δ(nkdS)<br />

δbi<br />

Sw<br />

T<br />

An T Ψ δxk<br />

dS<br />

δbi<br />

(4.23)<br />

which differs from Eq. (4.18) since Eq. (4.23) is free <strong>of</strong> field integrals. Thus,<br />

the gradient values are computed with less computational cost <strong>and</strong> greater<br />

accuracy. In addition, Eq. (4.23) is more general <strong>and</strong> can be used with either<br />

structured or unstructured grids.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> Eq. (4.23):<br />

The integration by parts <strong>of</strong> the second term on the right-h<strong>and</strong> side (r.h.s.) <strong>of</strong><br />

Eq. (4.22) gives<br />

�<br />

Ω<br />

T ∂<br />

Ψ<br />

∂xk<br />

� ∂fk<br />

∂bi<br />

� �<br />

dΩ = −<br />

�<br />

+<br />

Ω<br />

∂U T<br />

∂bi<br />

Si,o,w<br />

�<br />

A T �<br />

∂Ψ<br />

k dΩ<br />

∂xk<br />

T ∂fk<br />

Ψ nkdS . (4.24)<br />

∂bn<br />

Employing the no-penetration condition, the second integral on the r.h.s <strong>of</strong><br />

Eq. (4.24) is written as<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

T ∂fk<br />

T δfk<br />

T ∂fk δxm<br />

Ψ nkdS = Ψ nkdS − Ψ nkdS<br />

Sw ∂bi Sw δbi Sw ∂xm δbi<br />

�<br />

�<br />

δp<br />

= Ψk+1nk dS + (Ψk+1p − Ψ<br />

Sw δbi Sw<br />

T fk) δ(nkdS)<br />

δbi<br />

� T<br />

∂U<br />

− An<br />

∂xk<br />

T Ψ δxk<br />

dS . (4.25)<br />

δbi<br />

Sw

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!