07.02.2013 Views

Optimization and Computational Fluid Dynamics - Department of ...

Optimization and Computational Fluid Dynamics - Department of ...

Optimization and Computational Fluid Dynamics - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18 Gábor Janiga<br />

2.1 Introduction<br />

Designing optimal shapes or optimal configurations for practical engineering<br />

applications has been the subject <strong>of</strong> numerous publications during the<br />

last decade. Generic <strong>and</strong> robust search methods inside the design space, such<br />

as Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs), <strong>of</strong>fer several attractive features for such<br />

problems [38]. The basic idea associated with the EA approach is to search<br />

for optimal solutions using an analogy to the evolution theory. During the<br />

iteration (or “evolution” using EA terminology) procedure, the decision variables<br />

or genes are manipulated using various operators (selection, combination,<br />

crossover or mutation) to create new design populations, i.e., new sets<br />

<strong>of</strong> decision variables. For simpler optimization problems, more classical optimization<br />

methods, like the Simplex approach, are <strong>of</strong>ten better adapted to<br />

find the optimal solution within a small number <strong>of</strong> iterations [74].<br />

The main goal <strong>of</strong> this work is to achieve cost-efficient design optimization<br />

<strong>of</strong> problems involving complex flows with heat transfer or chemical reactions<br />

using <strong>Computational</strong> <strong>Fluid</strong> <strong>Dynamics</strong> (CFD) codes for practical configurations,<br />

while keeping reasonable overall computing times.<br />

Classical optimization techniques, like gradient-based methods are known<br />

for their lack <strong>of</strong> robustness <strong>and</strong> for their tendency to fall into local optima.<br />

Generic <strong>and</strong> robust search methods, such as EAs [16, 34], <strong>of</strong>fer several<br />

attractive features <strong>and</strong> have been used widely for design shape optimization<br />

[1, 48, 55, 62, 64]. They can, in particular, be used for multi-objective<br />

multi-parameter problems. They have been successfully tested in many practical<br />

cases, for example for design shape optimization in the aerospace<br />

[1, 24, 54, 55, 64] <strong>and</strong> automotive industry [61]. The use <strong>of</strong> a fully automatic<br />

EA coupled with CFD for a multi-objective problem still remains limited by<br />

the computing time <strong>and</strong> is up to now far from being a practical tool for all<br />

engineering applications.<br />

2.1.1 Purpose<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this chapter is to illustrate possible methodologies for the<br />

fully automatic optimization <strong>of</strong> various engineering problems involving CFD.<br />

We are not interested here in developing a new algorithm for optimization.<br />

We solely wish to demonstrate that it is possible to reach an optimal configuration<br />

for a case involving coupled fluid flow, heat transfer <strong>and</strong> chemical<br />

reactions, investigated using CFD within a reasonable computing time, for<br />

configurations very close to practical ones.<br />

In Case A, we consider laminar flows because it corresponds to a realistic<br />

engineering problem, for example for low-power systems. A model configuration<br />

is chosen consisting <strong>of</strong> a cross-flow tube bank heat exchanger. The<br />

problem is to optimize the positions <strong>of</strong> the tubes so that the heat exchange is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!