07.02.2013 Views

Optimization and Computational Fluid Dynamics - Department of ...

Optimization and Computational Fluid Dynamics - Department of ...

Optimization and Computational Fluid Dynamics - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

76 H.G. Bock <strong>and</strong> V. Schulz<br />

computed in advance, <strong>and</strong> have a potential to speed up the final solution<br />

process.<br />

In the special case <strong>of</strong> NMPC, a sequence <strong>of</strong> neighboring optimization problems<br />

on a receding time horizon has to be solved, which differ only by (an<br />

estimate <strong>of</strong>) the initial value <strong>of</strong> the states y(t0) <strong>and</strong> possibly by a change in<br />

the set-point, i.e., parameters <strong>and</strong> scenarios. Minimal response delays can be<br />

achieved by the “real–time iteration” (RTI) in combination with a “perturbation<br />

embedding” as developed in [7, 13, 14]. Here, huge savings in computing<br />

time are gained by a kind <strong>of</strong> hot start property because already the first<br />

QP solution in a full step inexact SQP method provides a nearly tangential<br />

approximation <strong>of</strong> the exact solution if the problem is initialized with the solution<br />

<strong>of</strong> the previous problem, even in the presence <strong>of</strong> a change <strong>of</strong> the active<br />

constraints. Furthermore, the calculations can be divided into a preparation<br />

phase that can be performed without knowledge <strong>of</strong> y0, <strong>and</strong> a much shorter<br />

feedback phase that allows to make the delay even shorter than the sampling<br />

time. This remaining delay is typically orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude smaller than the<br />

sampling time <strong>and</strong> thus we can consider the feedback to be instantaneous. So<br />

the sampling time is practically only needed to prepare the following real–<br />

time iteration. Additionally, cheap feasibility <strong>and</strong>/or optimality improving<br />

subiterations (FOI) can be performed that reuse Jacobians <strong>and</strong> Hessians <strong>of</strong><br />

the previous step <strong>and</strong> require only one forward <strong>and</strong> additionally one adjoint<br />

solution, respectively.<br />

For a more detailed description <strong>of</strong> the real-time iteration scheme <strong>and</strong> its<br />

convergence <strong>and</strong> nominal stability properties, please refer to [14].<br />

3.3.4 Sensitivity Driven Multiple Shooting<br />

In parameter estimation problems for CFD models, it is possible to use a<br />

multiple shooting time-domain decomposition <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it from its superior<br />

convergence properties, <strong>and</strong> on the other h<strong>and</strong> reduce the optimization space<br />

only to the parameters to be estimated. In these problems, one uses a generalized<br />

Gauss-Newton approach which achieves rather good convergence already<br />

with information <strong>of</strong> first order only. The linearized least-squares subproblem<br />

is condensed to the unknown parameters, which can be achieved while only<br />

marching forward in time with a conventional time-integration scheme. This<br />

idea was originally developed in [33], <strong>and</strong> has been successfully applied to<br />

multiphase problems, e.g., in [19]. Extensions to Newton-type methods for<br />

general objectives, e.g., in control problems were developed in [31, 32].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!