08.02.2013 Views

entire book - Chris Hables Gray

entire book - Chris Hables Gray

entire book - Chris Hables Gray

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Postmodern Wars Imaginary and Real [ 151 ]<br />

were augmented with submarine missiles. "Mutually assured destruction"<br />

(MAD) was superseded by counterforce doctrines of controlled response.<br />

Strategic nuclear weapons were joined by tactical ones. All of these expansions<br />

were justified by elite research institutes.<br />

Jonathan Schell comments on an important reason that strategic theory<br />

was relegated to these "think tanks":<br />

This term, evoking a hermetic world of thought, exactly reflects the<br />

intellectual circumstances of those thinkers whose job it is to deduce from<br />

pure theory, without the lessons of experience, what might happen if<br />

nuclear hostilities broke out. (1982, p. 140)<br />

U.S. strategic doctrine sprang from the think tanks founded after World War<br />

II, especially RAND Corp. In Wizards of Armageddon, a history of strategic<br />

doctrine, Fred Kaplan (1983) traces the military roots of most of the key<br />

theorists:<br />

• RAND founders Arthur Raymond and Larry Henderson were with<br />

the B-29 Special Bombardment Project and the Office of Scientific Research<br />

and Development.<br />

• Albert Wohlstetter worked for the Planning Committee of the War<br />

Production Board doing OR and scientific management. At RAND he did<br />

SA and game theory.<br />

• Ed Paxson invented SA, by which he meant asking which system did<br />

the job best instead of asking how can this system (operation) be made to<br />

function most efficiently. This meant becoming a military planner instead of<br />

being just an efficiency expert. The terms are now almost interchangeable<br />

except among adepts. Kaplan describes Paxson's fascination with planning<br />

World War III:<br />

His dream was to quantify every single factor of a strategic bombing<br />

campaign—the cost, weight and pay load of each bomber, its distance from<br />

the target, how it should fly in formation with other bombers and their<br />

fighter escorts, their exact routing patterns, the refueling procedures, the<br />

rate of attrition, the probability that something might go wrong in each<br />

step along the way, the weight and accuracy of the bomb, the vulnerability<br />

of the target, the bomb's "kill probability," the routing of the planes back<br />

to their bases, the fuel consumed, and all extraneous phenomena such as<br />

the weather—and put them all into a single mathematical equation.<br />

(1983, p. 87)<br />

These men were joined at RAND by Herman Kahn, who became an SA<br />

expert and then applied "his peculiar brand of logic, mathematical calculation,<br />

[and] rationality" to the fighting of nuclear war (Kaplan, pp. 221-226).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!