08.02.2013 Views

entire book - Chris Hables Gray

entire book - Chris Hables Gray

entire book - Chris Hables Gray

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Uses of Science [ 81 ]<br />

Science has changed in many ways since Francis Bacon's day. Now<br />

scientists do experiment on and with occult (hidden) forces that were once<br />

considered by most scientists to be impossible. But science still remains a<br />

form of limited rationality constrained by the material limits of intervention<br />

and representation. If science claimed no more, that would be one thing, but<br />

instead it often wears the guise of sweet reason itself.<br />

Some critics and scientists have called for integrating science with the<br />

rest of society, for scientists discarding the cloak of impartial rationality and<br />

accepting some social responsibility. Sandra Harding goes further and elaborates<br />

a postmodern feminist revaluing of science to make "moral, political,<br />

and historical self-consciousness ... of primary importance in assessing the<br />

adequacy of research practices" (1986, p. 250). 3<br />

How is this intervention described and evaluated? It depends on the<br />

rules. Many of the rules seem to be physical laws; many clearly are not. Which<br />

rules are applied depends on the metarules, the rules about the rules. What<br />

counts as evidence? Who is allowed to speak? To publish? To make jokes?<br />

Who is made into a joke? To approach these questions the figure of postmodernism<br />

should be sketched more fully because, above all, postmodernism<br />

seems to mark a growing concern with these metarules or at least a growing<br />

difficulty in hiding them. And the game of discourse that is being ruled and<br />

metaruled must be discussed in more detail as well, with specific attention<br />

to the conversations of the AI community.<br />

Postmodernism<br />

Since the mid-1930s there has been talk of postmodernism. Some postmodernists<br />

are defined only through their critique of modernism. Deconstruction<br />

and sometimes poststructuralism are often put in this category. By no means<br />

is there a consensus among philosophers about the meaning or value of<br />

postmodernism (let alone deconstruction or poststructuralism or anything,<br />

actually). However, beyond philosophy there is more clarity. In certain fields<br />

"modern" has taken on very specific historical and/or symbolic meanings.<br />

Architecture and art are the best examples. In other areas, such as the history<br />

of war, modem war is defined both chronologically and qualitatively.<br />

Postmodernism also has varying qualities in different domains, but there<br />

do seem to be certain themes that appear with regularity as they do with<br />

science:<br />

• Information is the organizing principle. Science, war, politics, and<br />

business all situate information at the center of their particular<br />

discourses. At the same time there is a disillusionment with the grand<br />

master narratives of modernism: art, progress, science, technology,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!