Consenso uruguayo de manejo del infarto agudo de ... - SciELO

72. Steg PG, Bonnefoy E, Chabaud S, Lapostolle F, Dubien PY,
Cristofini P, et al. Impact of time to treatment on mortality after prehospital
fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty: data from the CAPTIM randomized
clinical trial. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2851-6.
73. Widimsky P, Budesinsky T, Vorac D, Groch L, Zelizko M,
Aschermann M, et al. Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs
immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: Final results of the
randomized national multicentre trial--PRAGUE-2. Eur Heart J 2003; 24:
94-104.
74. Nallamothu BK, Bates ER. Percutaneous coronary intervention
versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: is timing (almost)
everything?. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92: 824-6.
75. Wu AH, Parsons L, Every NR, Bates ER, for the Second National
Registry of Myocardial Infarction. Hospital outcomes in patients
presenting with congestive heart failure complicating acute myocardial
infarction: a report from the Second National Registry of Myocardial
Infarction (NRMI-2). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 1389-94.
76. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al, for the Should We
Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock
(SHOCK) Investigators. Early revascularization in acute myocardial
infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 625-
34.
77. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, White HD, Dzavik V, Wong SC, Menon
V, et al. One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic
shock. JAMA 2001; 285: 190-2.
78. The GUSTO investigators. An international randomized trial
comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N
Engl J Med 1993; 329: 673-82.
79. Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Rasmussen K, Thuesen L, Kelbaek H,
Thayssen P, et al. A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic
therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 733-42.
80. Aversano T, Aversano LT, Passamani E, Knatterud GL, Terrin
ML, Williams DO, et al. Thrombolytic therapy vs primary percutaneous
coronary intervention for myocardial infarction in patients presenting to
hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
JAMA 2002; 287: 1943-51.
81. Widimský P, Groch L, Zelízko M, Aschermann M, Bednár F,
Suryapranata H. Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to
primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for
patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community
hospital without a catheterization laboratory: The PRAGUE study. Eur
Heart J 2000; 21: 823-31.
82. Vermeer F, Oude-Ophuis AJ, vd-Berg EJ, Brunninkhuis LG,
Werter CJ, Boehmer AG, et al. Prospective randomised comparison
between thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients with
extensive myocardial infarction admitted to a hospital without PTCA