Consenso uruguayo de manejo del infarto agudo de ... - SciELO
Consenso uruguayo de manejo del infarto agudo de ... - SciELO
Consenso uruguayo de manejo del infarto agudo de ... - SciELO
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Reperfusion Alternatives Evaluation (BRAVE) Study Investigators.<br />
Early administration of reteplase plus abciximab vs abciximab alone in<br />
patients with acute myocardial infarction referred for percutaneous coronary<br />
intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291: 947-54.<br />
93. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival)<br />
Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral<br />
aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases suspected acute myocardial<br />
infarction: ISIS-2. Lancet 1988; 2: 349-60.<br />
94. Roux S, Christeller S, Lüdin E. Effects of aspirin on coronary<br />
reocclusion and recurrent ischemia after thrombolysis: a metaanalysis. J Am<br />
Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 671-7.<br />
95. Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration. Collaborative metaanalysis<br />
of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of <strong>de</strong>ath,<br />
myocardial infarction, and stroke in high-risk patients. BMJ 2002; 324: 71-<br />
86.<br />
96. Hennekens CH, Dyken ML, Fuster V. Aspirin as a therapeutic agent<br />
in cardiovascular disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the<br />
American Heart Association. Circulation 1997; 96: 2751-3.<br />
97. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio <strong>de</strong>lla Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto<br />
Miocardico. GISSI-2: a factorial randomised trial of alteplase versus<br />
streptokinase and heparin versus no heparin among12,490 patients with<br />
acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1990; 336: 65-71.<br />
98. The International Study Group. In-hospital mortality and clinical<br />
course of 20,891 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction<br />
randomised between alteplase and streptokinase with or without heparin.<br />
Lancet 1990; 336: 71-5.<br />
99. ISIS-3 (Third International Study of Infarct Survival)<br />
Collaborative Group. ISIS-3: a randomised comparison of streptokinase vs<br />
tissue plasminogen activator vs anistreplase and of aspirin plus heparin vs<br />
aspirin alone among41,299 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction.<br />
Lancet 1992; 339: 753-70.<br />
100. Collins R, Peto R, Baigent C, Sleight P. Aspirin, heparin, and<br />
fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med<br />
1997; 336: 847-60.<br />
101. The GUSTO Angiographic Investigators. The effects of tissue<br />
plasminogen activator, streptokinase, or both on coronary-artery patency,<br />
ventricular function, and survival after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J<br />
Med 1993; 329: 1615-22.<br />
102. Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a NewThrombolytic<br />
Regimen (ASSENT)-3 Investigators. Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in<br />
combination with enoxaparin, abciximab, or unfractionated heparin: the<br />
ASSENT-3 randomised trial in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 2001;<br />
358: 605-13.<br />
103. Wallentin L, Goldstein P, Armstrong PW, Granger CB, Adgey<br />
AA, Arntz HR, et al. Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination