Untitled - Ditjen Cipta Karya - Departemen Pekerjaan Umum

Contoh : Ringkasan Format Tabel Tabulasi Hasil Evaluasi Teknis Proposal bagian dari Lampiran Laporan EvaluasiNO. CRITERIA/SUB CRITERIA WeightSCORING BOARDI. Specific Experience of Consultant 5-10% Number of projects 0 - 1 2-3 4-5 >5Related to the Assignment Grade P S G VGScore 0-20 40 - 60 80 - 100 1001.1 Experience relevant to Scope of TA Package .. % P = PoorS = Satisfactory1.2 Same Experience to TA Package .. % G= Good(Lead Firm 70% & Members JV/Sub.Consultant 30%)VG = Very GoodII Adequacy of the Proposed Workplan and 20-50% Grade P S G VGMethodology Responding to the TOR Score 30 70 90 1002.1 Understanding of Project .. %2.2 Quality of Methodology and Innovativeness .. %2.3 Workplan and Staffing Schedule ..%III. Personnel 30-60%3.1 Team Leader .. %Relevant education and experience .. % Graduate D3 S1 S2 S3Score 60 - 75 75 - 90 90 -100 100Relevant Project Experience .. % Experience (years) < 10 10 - < 12 >=1250 80 - 95 100Language and Experience in Similar Condition .. % Grade P S G VG=12Specialist (1) .. % 50 80 - 95 100Relevant education and experience .. % Grade P S G VGRelevant Project Experience .. % 30 70 90 100Language and Experience in Similar Condition .. %3.2.2 Specialist (2) .. %Relevant education and experience .. %Relevant Project Experience .. %Language and Experience in Similar Condition .. %3.2.3 Expertise Expert (1) .. %Relevant education and experience .. %Relevant Project Experience .. %Language and Experience in Similar Condition .. %3.2.4 Expertise Expert (2) .. %Relevant education and experience .. %Relevant Project Experience .. %Language and Experience in Similar Condition .. %3.2.5 Other Expertise Expert .. %Relevant education and experience .. %Relevant Project Experience .. %Language and Experience in Similar Condition .. %TOTAL SCORETECHNICAL RANKINGKetua PanitiaAnggotaAnggotaAnggotaAnggota